Priority directions of innovative development in oil and gas complex at the Siberian Federal District

This article presents the research and design activities of oil and gas companies operating in the Siberian Federal district. The purpose of research is to develop priority areas of innovative development of the scientific and design complex. For the hypothesis of research, it has been assumed, that the priorities of innovative development of the research and design complex should be linked to external and internal industry challenges. As an initial data have been accepted the results of research, carried out by the authors for subsidiaries of the JSC “NK “Rosneft”. The research has identified a list of external and internal technological and production challenges, facing the oil and gas industry in Russia, analyzed the research activities of institutions, research and development of which are aimed at the development of oil and gas production in the Siberian Federal district, made a SWOT-analysis of innovative activities of research and design complexes. As a result of the identified challenges, facing the oil and gas industry, and the SWOT analysis, priority areas of innovative development of the oil and gas complex have been allocated. In particular, it has been found, that in order to overcome successfully the challenges, facing the oil and gas industry, it is necessary to implement a number of technological and managerial reforms in the shortest possible time, including the development of competencies in the field of integrated design, starting with the reservoir model and ending with the economic justification for the development of the field using advanced equipment and technologies in projects. The need to create domestic software for the needs of exploration, production, and automation of management activities of companies has been also noted. The scientific contribution of the conducted research is that the promising directions of innovative development of scientific and design complexes of the industry have been correlated with modern external and internal challenges, facing the oil and gas industry.

1. Belen’kaya N. V. Pershukov V. A. Instrumenty upravleniya intellektual’nym kapitalom v krupnoi tekhnologicheskoi kompanii [Managing intellectual capital tools in a large technology company]. Upravlenie [Management], 2014, no. 3 (5), pp. 53−57. (In Russian).

2. Demin S.S., Dzhamai E. V., Putyatina L. M. Upravlenie innovatsionnoi modernizatsiei vysokotekhnologichnykh i naukoemkikh otraslei ekonomiki Rossii [Management of innovative modernization of high-tech and knowledge-intensive sectors of the Russian economy]. Upravlenie [Management], 2016, no. 3 (13), 57−66. (In Russian).

3. Kaverin A. A. Strategicheskie prioritety innovatsionnogo razvitiya neftyanoi promyshlennosti Rossii [Strategic priorities of innovative development of the Russian oil industry]. Vestnik universiteta [University Bulletin], 2016, no. 4, pp. 5−11. (In Russian).

4. Kaverin A. A., Korkin A. M., Motus S. E, Agafontsev A. F., Nizametdinov A. A. Razvitie sistemy tipovogo proektirovaniya v PAO “NK “Rosneft’” [Development of a standard design system in JSC “NK Rosneft”]. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo [Oil Industry Journal], 2013, no. 11, pp. 46−48. (In Russian).

5. Afanas'ev V. Y, Linnik Yu. N, Bolshakova O. I, Linnik V. Yu, Kaverin A. A. Neftegazovyi kompleks: proizvodstvo, ekonomika, upravlenie: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Oil and gas complex: production, economy, management], 2nd edition. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2017, 780 p. (In Russian).

6. Sushko Yu. V., Kaverin A. A., Korkin A. M., Agafontsev A. F., Shafikov I .S. Podkhody k tipizatsii proektnykh reshenii v OAO “NK Rosneft’” [Approaches to the typification of design decisions in JSC “NK Rosneft”]. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo [Oil Industry Journal], 2013, no. 11, pp. 61−63. (In Russian).

7. Afanas'ev V. Y, Linnik Yu. N, Voznesenskaya A. D., Linnik V. Yu., Kaverin A. A. Teoriya i praktika prognozirovaniya tsen na energoresursy [Energyresources price forecast – theory and practice]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2016, 339 p. (In Russian).

8. Khodyaev A. V, Red’ko P. Yu. Vizualizatsiya rezul’tatov ploshchadnoi seismorazvedki v trekhmernom prostranstve s pomoshch’yu web-tekhnologii [Results of the area seismic survey visualization in three-dimensional space using web-technologies]. Burenie i neft’ [Drilling and oil], 2015, no. 4, pp. 32−33. (In Russian).

9. Chernyatin S. V. Kontseptual’nye osnovy metodologii formirovaniya programmy innovatsionnogo razvitiya vertikal’no integrirovannoi kompanii [Methodology concepts for the formation of an innovative development program for a vertically integrated company]. Upravlenie [Management], 2015, no. 4 (10), pp. 75−84. (In Russian).

10. Bajus M. Shale gas and tight oil, unconventional fossil fuels. Petroleum & Coal., 2014, no. 56 (3), pp. 206–221.

11. Dale S. New economics of oil. Society of business economists annual conference, London, 13 October, 2015. 2016. Available at: http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/speeches/2015/new-economics-of-oil-spencer-dale.pdf (accessed 12.02.19).

12. Girth A. M., Hefetz A., Johnston J. M., Warner M. E. Outsourcing public service delivery: Management responses in non-competitive markets. Public Administration Review, 2012, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 887–900.

13. Hefetz A., Warner M. Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market, and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2011, no. 22, pp. 289–317.

14. Hoppe E. I., Kusterer D. J., Schmitz P. W. Public-private partnerships versus traditional procurement: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2013, no. 89, pp. 145−166.

15. Tang L., Shen Q., Cheng E. A review of studies on public-private partnership projects in the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, no. 28, pp. 683−694.