Learning Networks: an Alternative to Traditional Methods of Managing Organizational Change. What We Can Learn from the Experience of the National Society of French Railways
https://doi.org/10.12737/18798
Abstract
In an unstable economic environment, organizations and companies must constantly adapt and innovate to remain competitive. To innovate and develop its ability to adapt, the organization (company) must release the power of the thoughts and actions of its employees, it must become a learning organization. Learning networks are one of the forms of the learning organization and an alternative to traditional methods of managing organizational change. Learning networks can be used while driving organizational change and should involve the largest number of participants and introduce change whilst satisfying the needs of customers, employees and the company. In this article, we will present the keys to operating learning networks and some key results achieved through learning networks within the National Society of French Railways, where these networks have been in use since 2007.
About the Authors
David AutisierFrance
Doctor of Management (HDR), Director
Professor
E.V. Pachtchenko-de Préville
France
Doctor of Psychology (PhD), Researcher
Associated Researcher
Thierry Raynard
France
Leading Expert on Collective Intelligence, Human Resources Cohesion Group, HR-Department
References
1. Argyris C., Schön D.-A, Organizational Learning II, Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley, 1996.
2. Argyris C., Schön D., Apprentissage organisationnel : théorie, méthode, pratique, Bruxelles, De Boeck Supérieur. Management, 2001.
3. Autissier D., Giraud L., Jonson K.J., Moutot J.-M. Les liens entre les caractéristiques et le succès des changements organisationnels : le cas d’une start-up. Question(s) de Management ?, N°3, septembre 2013, pp. 11-24.
4. Autissier D., Hureau J.-P., Raynard T., Vandangeon-Derumez I. Les réseaux apprenants : Une démarche d’accompagnement du changement dans la relation de service à la SNCF. Paris, Eyrolles, 2013.
5. Bercovitz J., Feldman, M. Academic entrepreneurs : Organisational change and the individual level. Organization Science, 2008, 19(1), pp.69-89.
6. Landier H. Vers l’entreprise intelligente. Paris, CalmannLevy, 1991.
7. Lüscher L., Lewis M. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51 (2) pp. 221–240.
8. Morin E., La méthode (6 tomes). Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1977 (t.1).
9. Morin E., Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris, Editions du Seuil, 2005
10. PROFIL.SNCF. Available at: www.sncf.com/ressources/ reports/sncf_profil_2015.pdf (accessed 9 November 2015).
11. Senge P.M. The Fifth Discipline. New York, Doubleday, 1990.
12. Senge P., La Cinquième Discipline. L’art et la manière des organisations qui apprennent. Paris, First Editions, 1991.
13. Senge P., La Cinquième Discipline. Levier des organisations apprenantes. Eyrolles, Paris, 2015.
14. SOL France. Available at: www.solfrance.org (accessed 29 March 2014).
15. Zarifian P., Objectif compétence. Paris, Editions Liaisons, 1999.
Review
For citations:
Autisier D., Pachtchenko-de Préville E., Raynard T. Learning Networks: an Alternative to Traditional Methods of Managing Organizational Change. What We Can Learn from the Experience of the National Society of French Railways. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2016;(1):84-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/18798