State Corporations and Structural Changes in the Economy
https://doi.org/10.12737/21291
Abstract
The article focuses attention on a possible contribution of the state corporations to long-term results of economic development. It is shown that such corporations can make the significant contribution to ensuring dynamic efficiency of economy, to implementation of structural shifts in production. The role of the state corporations in formation of the infrastructure necessary for wide use of essentially new technologies is analyzed.
Supporting agencies: This work has been financially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants № 14-06-00164).
About the Author
V. E. Dementiev
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director
Professor of the Department of Institutional Economics
References
1. OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of StateOwned Enterprises. 2015 Edition.
2. Sappington, D.E.M. and Stiglitz, J.E. Privatization, information and incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1987, №4, рp. 567–582.
3. Polterovich V.M. Privatizacia i ratcionalnaia struktura sobstvennosti [Privatization and rational structure of property]. Moscow, Institut ekonomiki RAN Publ., 2012.
4. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, Jean Tirole. Privatization and Incentives. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1991, №7 (Special issue), pр. 84–105.
5. Musacchio, Aldo and Lazzarini, Sérgio G. Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Harvard University Press, 2014.
6. De Soto Jesús Huerta. The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency. London: Routledge, 2009.
7. Teece David J. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
8. Villalonga, B. Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effect. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2000, 42(1), pp. 43–77.
9. Okten C., Arin K.P. The Effects of Privatization on Efficiency: How Does Privatization Work? World Development, 2006, Vol. 34, Issue 9, pp. 1537–1556.
10. Straska, M., and Waller, G. Does investment improve when firms go private? Managerial Finance, 2012, 38(2), pp. 124–142. Francis J., and Smith A. Agency Costs and Innovation Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1995, 19(2), pp. 383–409. Aghion, P., Van Reenen, J. and Zingales, L. Innovation and Institutional Ownership. American Economic Review, 2013, vol. 103(1), pp. 277–304, February.
11. Perez Carlota. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2002.
12. Hirooka M. Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Cheltenham, UK – Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006.
13. Ustiuzanina E.V. Normativnaia baza I praktika goskorporativnoi integratcii v rosiiskoi ekonomike [Regulatory base and practice of state corporate integration in the Russian economy]. Innovatsionnaia orientatsia rossiiskih ekonomicheskih institutov [Innovative orientation of the Russian economic institutes]. Мoscow, Kniznii dom “Librokom” Publ., 2009.
14. Chang, Roberto, Constantino Hevia, Norman Loayza. Privatization and Nationalization Cycles. Peruvian Economic Association. Working Paper No. 47, 2015.
15. Sheludyakova I.G., Dukart S.A. Tsikl nationalizatia privatizatia: sravnitelnii analiz rabot po problem preobrazovanii rezimov sobstvennosti [Tsikl nationalizationprivatization: comparative analysis of works on a problem of transformation of the modes of property]. Fundamentalnia issledovania [Basic researches], 2015, I. 2, pp. 4737–4741.
Review
For citations:
Dementiev V.E. State Corporations and Structural Changes in the Economy. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2016;(3):12-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/21291
Views:
668
Email this article 