manguuУправлениеUPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)2309-36332713-1645State University of Management10.12737/21291manguu-106Research ArticleНАУЧНАЯ ШКОЛА «ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА И УПРАВЛЕНИЕ» ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА УПРАВЛЕНИЯSCIENTIFIC SCHOOL «INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT» OF STATE UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENTГосударственные корпорации и структурные сдвиги в экономикеState Corporations and Structural Changes in the EconomyДементьевВ. Е.DementievV. E.

д-р экон. наук, профессор, зам. директора

профессор кафедры институциональной экономики 

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director

Professor of the Department of Institutional Economics

dementev@cemi.rssi.ruФГБУН «Центральный экономико-математический институт Российской академии наук», ФГБОУ ВО «Государственный университет управления»РоссияCentral Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, State University of ManagementRussian Federation201630092016031218Copyright © Дементьев В.Е., 20162016Дементьев В.Е.Dementiev V.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/106

Автор акцентирует внимание на возможном вкладе государственных корпораций в долговременные результаты экономического развития. Обосновывается, что эти корпорации могут вносить значительный вклад в обеспечение динамической эффективности экономики, в осуществление структурных сдвигов в производстве. Выделяется роль государственных корпораций в формировании инфраструктуры, необходимой для распространения принципиально новых технологий.

The article focuses attention on a possible contribution of the state corporations to long-term results of economic development. It is shown that such corporations can make the significant contribution to ensuring dynamic efficiency of economy, to implementation of structural shifts in production. The role of the state corporations in formation of the infrastructure necessary for wide use of essentially new technologies is analyzed.

государственные корпорациидинамическая эффективностьинфраструктураинновацииstate-owned corporationsdynamic efficiencyinfrastructureinnovationsРабота выполнена при финансовой поддержке гранта РФФИ № 14-06-00164.This work has been financially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants № 14-06-00164).ReferencesOECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of StateOwned Enterprises. 2015 Edition.OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of StateOwned Enterprises. 2015 Edition.Sappington D.E.M. and Stiglitz J.E. Privatization, information and incentives // Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. – 1987. – № 4. – pp. 567–582.Sappington, D.E.M. and Stiglitz, J.E. Privatization, information and incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1987, №4, рp. 567–582.Полтерович В.М. Приватизация и рациональная структура собственности [Текст] / В.М. Полтерович. – М.: Институт экономики РАН, 2012.Polterovich V.M. Privatizacia i ratcionalnaia struktura sobstvennosti [Privatization and rational structure of property]. Moscow, Institut ekonomiki RAN Publ., 2012.Laffont, Jean-Jacques, Jean Tirole. Privatization and Incentives // Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. – 1991. – №7 (Special issue). – pp. 84–105.Laffont, Jean-Jacques, Jean Tirole. Privatization and Incentives. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1991, №7 (Special issue), pр. 84–105.Musacchio Aldo and Lazzarini, Sérgio G. Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. – Harvard University Press, 2014.Musacchio, Aldo and Lazzarini, Sérgio G. Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Harvard University Press, 2014.De Soto Jesús Huerta. The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency. – London: Routledge, 2009.De Soto Jesús Huerta. The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency. London: Routledge, 2009.Teece David J. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Teece David J. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Villalonga B. Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effect // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. – 2000. – I. 42 (1). – pp. 43–77.Villalonga, B. Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effect. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2000, 42(1), pp. 43–77.Okten C., Arin K.P. The Effects of Privatization on Efficiency: How Does Privatization Work? // World Development. – 2006. – V. 34. – I. 9. – pp. 1537–1556.Okten C., Arin K.P. The Effects of Privatization on Efficiency: How Does Privatization Work? World Development, 2006, Vol. 34, Issue 9, pp. 1537–1556.Straska M., Waller G. Does investment improve when firms go private? // Managerial Finance. – 2012. – I. 38 (2). – pp. 124–142.Straska, M., and Waller, G. Does investment improve when firms go private? Managerial Finance, 2012, 38(2), pp. 124–142. Francis J., and Smith A. Agency Costs and Innovation Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1995, 19(2), pp. 383–409. Aghion, P., Van Reenen, J. and Zingales, L. Innovation and Institutional Ownership. American Economic Review, 2013, vol. 103(1), pp. 277–304, February.Francis J. and Smith A. Agency Costs and Innovation Some Empirical Evidence // Journal of Accounting and Economics. – 1995. – I. 19(2). – pp. 383–409.Perez Carlota. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2002.Aghion P., Van Reenen J. and Zingales L. Innovation and Institutional Ownership // American Economic Review. – 2013. – V. 103 (1). – pp. 277–304, February.Hirooka M. Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Cheltenham, UK – Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006.Perez Carlota. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of bubbles and Golden Ages. – Cheltenham: Elgar, 2002.Ustiuzanina E.V. Normativnaia baza I praktika goskorporativnoi integratcii v rosiiskoi ekonomike [Regulatory base and practice of state corporate integration in the Russian economy]. Innovatsionnaia orientatsia rossiiskih ekonomicheskih institutov [Innovative orientation of the Russian economic institutes]. Мoscow, Kniznii dom “Librokom” Publ., 2009.Hirooka M. Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. – Cheltenham, UK – Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006.Chang, Roberto, Constantino Hevia, Norman Loayza. Privatization and Nationalization Cycles. Peruvian Economic Association. Working Paper No. 47, 2015.Устюжанина Е.В. Нормативная база и практика госкорпоративной интеграции в российской экономике [Текст] / Е.В. Устюжанина. – В кн.: Инновационная ориентация российских экономических институтов / под. ред. В.Е. Дементьева. – М.: Книжный дом «Либроком», 2009.Sheludyakova I.G., Dukart S.A. Tsikl nationalizatia privatizatia: sravnitelnii analiz rabot po problem preobrazovanii rezimov sobstvennosti [Tsikl nationalizationprivatization: comparative analysis of works on a problem of transformation of the modes of property]. Fundamentalnia issledovania [Basic researches], 2015, I. 2, pp. 4737–4741.Chang R., Constantino H., Norman L. Privatization and Nationalization Cycles. Peruvian Economic Association. Working Paper No. 47, 2015.Chang R., Constantino H., Norman L. Privatization and Nationalization Cycles. Peruvian Economic Association. Working Paper No. 47, 2015.Шелудякова И.Г., Дукарт С.А. Цикл национализацияприватизация: сравнительный анализ работ по проблеме преобразования режимов собственности [Текст] / И.Г. Шелудякова; С.А. Дукарт // Фундаментальные исследования. – 2015. – № 2. – С. 4737–4741.Шелудякова И.Г., Дукарт С.А. Цикл национализацияприватизация: сравнительный анализ работ по проблеме преобразования режимов собственности [Текст] / И.Г. Шелудякова; С.А. Дукарт // Фундаментальные исследования. – 2015. – № 2. – С. 4737–4741.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.