Technological leaders: assessing production frontier in the Russian economy under external shocks (2019–2023)

The dynamics of technological frontier of Russian industries in 2019–2023 under the conditions of external shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 sanctions, has been studied. Unlike traditional DEA-based studies, the authors use a parametric approach based on log-log quantile regression to assess technological leaders’ behavior and the shift in the upper bound of production capabilities. Two models have been studied: a two-factor model (capital and labor) and a three-factor model (capital, labor, and material costs), which allowed for the distinction between capital and labor returns and resource adaptation effects. Based on data from Russian enterprises (2019–2023), an industry-specific assessment of technological progress and factor elasticity coefficients has been conducted. It has been shown that the 2020 crisis caused a short-term decline in technological frontier, followed by recovery, while the 2022 shock led to a longer-lasting decline, which was not overcome in most industries in 2023. The three-factor model has revealed the compensatory role of material efficiency in enterprises adaptation to external constraints. The most sustained growth in frontier has been observed in the IT sector, while the deepest decline has been observed in the automotive industry. The research findings clarify the technological leadership mechanisms and Russian industries adaptation in the face of external shocks.

1. Aparicio, J., Santin, D. (2024). Global scale efficiency in data envelopment analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 32(5), 2474–2496. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13501

2. Cozzi, G. (2023). Semi-endogenous or fully endogenous growth? A unified theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 213, 105732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2023.105732

3. Dzhorobaeva, M. A. (2024). The Role of Import Substitution in the Development of the Russian Pharmaceutical Market. Economy: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 14(3A), 196–205. (In Russian).

4. Fukushige, M. (2022). Quantile regression approach for measuring production inefficiency by estimating the target and production technology of individual units. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 6(2), 395–415.

5. Fusco, E., Benedetti, R., & Vidoli, F. (2022). Stochastic frontier estimation through parametric modelling of quantile regression coefficients. Empirical Economics, 64(2), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02273-x

6. Gudkova, O. E. (2024). The Impact of International Technological Sanctions on the Innovative Development of the Russian National Economy. Journal of Economy, Entrepreneurship and Law, 14(5), 1753–1768. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.14.5.120948

7. Jones, C. I. (2022). The Past and Future of Economic Growth: A Semi-Endogenous Perspective. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080521-012458

8. Jradi, S., Ruggiero, J. (2019). Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis: A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimate the Production Frontier. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(2), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.017

9. Koenker, R. (2017). Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098

10. Kurbatova, A. S. (2023). Prospects for Import Substitution in the Russian IT Sector under Sanctions Pressure. Modern World Economy, 1(4). (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/2949-5776-2023-1-4-108-128

11. Malkina, M. Yu. (2025). Development Trends of Russian Industry and Its Sectors during New Anti-Russian Sanctions. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 19(3), 524–544. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.3.524-544

12. Papadopoulos, A., Parmeter, C. F. (2022). Quantile Methods for Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 12(1), 1–120. https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000042

13. Peykani, P., Soltani, R., Tanasescu, C., Shojaie, S. E., & Jandaghian, A. (2025). The Robust Malmquist Productivity Index. Mathematics, 13(11), 1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13111727

14. Tone, K. (2004). Malmquist Productivity Index. In: Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer.

15. Vorobeva, D. V., Shchelokova, S. V. (2025). Strategic Changes in Russian Automotive Market (2018–2023). The World of New Economy, 19(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2025-19-2-86-93

16. Zubarevich, N. V. (2025). The Impact of Sanctions on the Development of Russian Regions in 2022–2024. Journal of the New Economic Association, 1(66), 274–281. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2025_1_274-281