The theoretical concept of determining the critical point of crisis processes in the socio-economic system

From the position of the modern theory of crisis management, a hypothesis of the presence of a critical point in the development of a socio-economic system has proposed. Depending on the severity of the crisis, limited resources and time, the relationship between the degree of controllability and destructible system has considered. The degree of crisis affects the replenishment of the resource mass of the system, as a result, the available lack of time and resources leads to loss of controllability and at the same time an increase in the probability of destruction. Moreover, if at a certain moment we start implementing anti-crisis measures, then we manage not to lose control over the managed processes and reduce the losses from the crisis and, most importantly, to preserve the stability of the socio-economic system. The feedback of the functions of controllability and destructibility makes it possible to determine the critical point of crisis processes in the socio-economic system. Constant monitoring and evaluation of the position of the critical point contribute to forecasting, early identification of crisis processes, and early preparation for them in order to ensure the sustainable and continuous functioning of socio-economic systems at various levels. The monitoring indicator is the basis for building an anti-crisis monitoring system. Such a parameter should be an integral indicator, represented by a set of variables, each of which reflects the state of the enterprise from different angles. This indicator allows you to assess the probability of destruction of the enterprise and determine the place on the trajectory of its development. One of the options for determining the degradability of the system in the article proposes to use bankruptcy assessment models. The provisions of the theory of crisis management in finding the critical point of crisis processes in socio-economic systems have developed.

crisis management, controllability, destructible, resource approach, microeconomics, mesoeconomics, sustainable development, crisis monitoring, assessment of the degree of controllability of the company

1. Alferov V. N., Berezin K. A., Kovan S. E., Plaksin S. Yu. Transformatsiya antikrizisnogo upravleniya v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh [Transformation of crisis management in modern economic conditions], Moskva: NITs INFRA-M, 2016, 157 p.

2. Kovan S. E. Krizisy᾽ i antikrizisnoe upravlenie v sotsial᾽- no-ekonomicheskikh sistemakh [Crises and crisis management in social and economic systems], Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie [Effective crisis management], 2011, I. 2, pp. 72–83.

3. Kovan S. E. Teoriya antikrizisnogo upravleniya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskimi sistemami (resursnyi podkhod) [Theory of crisis management of socio-economic systems (resource approach)], Moskva, NITs INFRA-M, 2013, 160 p.

4. Kochetkov E. P. Monitoring priznakov finansovo-ekonomicheskoi neustoichivosti organizatsii – uslovie sokhraneniya biznesa [Monitoring of signs of financial and economic instability of the organization-a condition of business preservation], Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie [Effective crisis management], 2012, I. 2, pp. 100–106.

5. Prigozhin A. I. Metody razvitiya organizatsii [The methods of development organizations], Moskva: MTsFER, 2003, 863 p.

6. Romanova E. R., Filippova Yu. A. Strategicheskoe planirovanie na regional’nom i munitsipal’nom urovnyakh: opyt i problemy realizatsii v Respublike Sakha (Yakutiya) [Strategic planning at the regional and municipal levels: experience and problems of implementation in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)]. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni M. K. Ammosova. Seriya «Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Kul’turologiya», 2016, I. 2, pp. 19-66.

7. Rybalkina Z. M. Mekhanizmy povysheniya urovnya upravlyaemosti organizatsii. Diss. kand. econ. nauk [Mechanisms increasing the level of controllability of the organization. Cand, Sci. (Economic) diss.], Penza, 2009, 180 p.

8. Ryakhovskaya A. N., Kovan S. E. Antikrizisnoe upravlenie: sovremennaya kontseptsiya i osnovnoi instrumentarii [Crisis management: modern concept and basic tools]. Upravlencheskie nauki [Management science], 2015, I. 3, pp. 45–55.

9. Stelmakh V. S. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osobennosti antikrizisnogo monitoringa [Theoretical and methodological features of crisis monitoring], KANT [KANT], 2018, I. 1, pp. 225–229.

10. Uiler D., Chambers D. Statisticheskoe upravlenie protsessami: Optimizatsiya biznesa s ispol’zovaniem kontrol’nykh kart Shukharta [Statistical process management: business Optimization using Shewhart control charts]. Moskva, Al’pina Biznes Buks, 2009, 409 p