Specialists and generalists

The article considers labor specialization in terms of A.A. Bogdanov’s General Organizational Science (Tectology), whose methodology provides conclusions different from generally accepted A. Smith’s concept of labor division. The article’s goal is to investigate specialist’s characteristics and his difference from generalist.

In terms of tectology, the difference is the cause of any process or phenomenon. Labor specialization is also based on difference – the difference between initial resources and collective consumption. The depth of labor specialization is determined by the number of people and the volume of their consumption. Reaching the global market’s limits has led to a reduction of differences in most markets and a decrease in production profitability, which in the long term can lead to the curtailment of material and energy flows. A qualitatively new difference may be the difference between the values and meanings of humanity, on the one hand, and the dehumanized technosphere, on the other. Subjects capable of linking these differences are generalists, capable of combining an understanding of the technosphere as a system, an awareness of long-term cause-and-effect relations, and the values and meanings of humanity.

The scientific novelty of the findings obtained lies in studying labor specialization and the prospects of its transition to universalization and generalization.

1. Adner R., Ruiz-Aliseda F., and Zemsky P. (2016), “Specialist versus generalist positioning: demand heterogeneity, technology scalability and endogenous market segmentation”, Strategy Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 184−206. https://doi.org/10.1287/ stsc.2016.0016

2. Al’tshuller G.S. (1979), TSIP-the theory ofsolving inventive problems, Sovetskoe Radio [Soviet Radio], Moscow, USSR, 239 p. (In Russian).

3. Bertalanffy L. (1969), General System Theory: foundations, development, Publ. George Braziller Inc., New York, USA, 296 p.

4. Bode H., Mosteller F., Tukey F., and Winsor C. (1949), “The education of a scientific generalist”, Science, vol. 109, no. 2840, pp. 553–558.

5. Bogdanov A.A. (1989), Tectology: a universal organizational science, In 2 Books, Book 1, Ed. L.I. Abalkin, Department of Economics of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Ekonomika Publ., Moscow, USSR, 304 p. (In Russian).

6. Buchen C., Kragl J. and Palermo A. (2021), “Specialist vs. generalist: efficiency in multitasking”, Economics Letters, vol. 199, no. 109699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109699

7. Chen G., Huang S., Meyer-Doyle P., and Mindruta D. (2021), “Generalist versus specialist CEOs and acquisitions: Two-sided matching and the impact of CEO characteristics on firm outcomes”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 42, issue 6, pp. 1184–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3258

8. Fricke D., and Roukny T. (2020), “Generalists and specialists in the credit market”, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 112, no. 105335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.04.014

9. Livshitz V.I. (2011), “Forming of creativity in the time of training for engineers of mass professions”, Higher Education in Russia, no. 11, pp. 42−51. (In Russian).

10. Mather K. (1951), “Objectives and nature of integrative studies”, Main Currents in Modern Thought, vol. 8, no. 11.

11. Mokiy V.S. (2018), “Prospects of training of generalists in the structure of higher education”, Universum: Psychology and Education: Electronic Scientific Journal, no. 3 (45). Available at: http://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/5600 (accessed 18.05.2021). (In Russian).

12. Rimskaya О.N. (2006), “The work of a University teacher in the quality management system”, The Vestnik of Tomsk State University: Scientific periodical. The Bulletin for operating scientific information “Questions of native history”, November, no. 94, pp. 112–123. (In Russian).

13. Rimskaya O.N., Chichelev M.E., Lyalina I.V. and Kranbikhler V.S. (2013), “Priorities and risks of fulfilling the state task for training specialists for the modern economy”, Siberian Journal of Science, no. 1 (7), pp. 195−201. (In Russian).

14. Rimskaya O.N., and Kranbikhler V.S. (2014), “Continuous education for staff of high-tech industries of economy of Russia”, Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, no. 10 (51), pp. 268−270. (In Russian).

15. Sergeev B.S. (2011), “Training of engineers-inventors”, Modern problems of Science and Education, no. 1, pp. 45–48. (In Russian).

16. Shpakovskii N.A., and Novitsaya E.L. (2011), TSIP. Practice of targeted invention, Forum, Moscow, Russia, 335 p. (In Russian).