Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)

Advanced search

Empire in the mirror of geopolitics

https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2019-1-121-127

Abstract

The article deals with the geopolitical views of the Empire as a special type of state and politics, the laws of its development and the place of the Empire in the theoretical constructions of modern geopolitics. The Empire appears to be a large-scale expansionist, geopolitically self-sufficient political entity. While in geopolitics are traditionally distinguished continental (tellurocracy) and sea (thalassocracy) Empires. Studies in the framework of the geopolitical approach fixate, that the extensive path of Imperial power entails a lack of resources to maintain the Imperial system, which has reached its maximum limits by this time. The crisis, linked with Imperial tension, marks the limit of Imperial expansion, followed by the collapse of the Empire into several smaller political entities. In the geopolitical aspect, the Empire-state is in close connection with the aspirations to dominate not only the subordinate periphery, but also other less important and powerful participants in international politics. The ability of the Empire to act as a center of power can be considered as one of its сharacteristics. In general, the geopolitical interpretation of the Empire allows us to point to its specifics, but not as a state, but as a special type of policy, aimed at establishing dominance by the content, which is the concentration of political resources and the exclusive position of the state, forming the Imperial center. Geopolitical analysis emphasizes the central position of the Imperial metropolis in the coordinates of the center–periphery relations, on the one hand, acting as a source of political guidelines and rules, on the other hand, the concentration of political resources and monopolistic political position, provided, among other things, by superiority in geopolitical positioning due to long-term strategic planning and policy.

About the Authors

Aleksandr Aseev
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Candidate of Philosofical Sciences


Vasilii Shishkov
Institute of Law and Security Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Candidate of Political Sciences


References

1. Brubank Dzh., Kuper F. Traektoriya imperii [Empire trajectory]. Mify i zabluzhdeniya v izuchenii imperii i natsionalizma. [Myths and misconceptions in the study of Empire and nationalism] Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2010, pp. 325−361.

2. Dugin A. G. Osnovy geopolitiki [Basics of geopolitics]. Moscow: Arktogeya centr, 2000. 928 p.

3. Kollinz R. Makroistoriya: Ocherki sotsiologii bol’shoi dlitel’nosti [Collins R. Macrohistory: Essays in sociology of the long run]. Russ. ed. Moscow: URSS: LENAND, 2015. 504 p.

4. Makkinder X. Dzh. Geograficheskaya os’ istorii [The geographical pivot of history]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 1995, no. 4, pp. 162−169.

5. Stinchkomb A. Geopoliticheskie ponyatiya i voennaya uyazvimost’ [Geopolitical concepts and military vulnerability]. Voina i geopolitika: Vremya mira: Al’manakh. I. 3. [War and geopolitics. Time of peace. Almanac] Novosibirsk, 2003, pp. 288–294.

6. Fedotov G. P. Sud’ba imperii. Imperii prizrachnykh orly... Sud’ba i grekhi Rossii (izbrannye stat’i po filosofii russkoi istorii i kul’tury): V 2 t. [The fate of empires. Empires ghostly eagles ...]. St.-Petersburg: Sofiya, 1991, V. 2, pp. 304−327.

7. Filippov A. F. Imperiya zhivet, poka est’ predstavlenie ob imperskoi missii [The empire lives while there is an idea of the imperial mission], Politicheskii zhurnal, [Political journal] 2005, no. 24 (75), pp. 32−39.

8. Filippov A. F. Smysl imperii: k sotsiologii politicheskogo prostranstva [The meaning of the empire: to the sociology of political space]. Inoe. Khrestomatiya novogo rossiiskogo samosoznaniya. [Otherwise. Anthology of new Russian identity] Pod red. S. Chernysheva. T. 3. M.: Argus, 1995, pp. 421–476.

9. Fridman Dzh. “Goryachie” tochki. Geopolitika, krizis i budushchee mira [Friedman G. Flashpoints: The Emerging Crisis in Europe]. SPb.: Piter, 2016, 400 p.

10. Frumkin, K. G. Prostranstvennaya estetika imperii [Spatial aesthetics of empires] // Svobodnaya mysl’ [Free thonght] – XXI, 2002, no. 9, pp. 75−81.

11. Tsymburskii V. Khelford Makinder: trilogiya khartlenda i prizvanie geopolitika. [Halford Mackinder: Heartland Trilogy and Calling Geopolitics]. Kosmopolis [Cosmopolis], 2006/2007, no. 2 (16), pp. 26–55.

12. Shishkov V. V. Imperiya kak ponyatie i kontsept sovremennoi politicheskoi nauki: problemy interpretatsii [Empire as a notion and concept of modern political science: the problems of interpretation] // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2018, no. 4, pp. 22−36.

13. Shmitt K. Dukhovno-istoricheskoe sostoyanie sovremennogo parlamentarizma. Predvaritel‘nye zamechaniya (O protivopolozhnosti parlamentarizma i demokratii) [Schmitt C. Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological review], 2009, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 6−16.

14. Shmitt, K. Nomos zemli v prave narodov jus publicum europaeum [Schmitt C. Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum], Moscow: Vladimir Dal’, 2008, 670 p.

15. Brant Ph. The geopolitics of chinese aid. Mapping beijing’s funding in the pacific. Foreign Affairs, March 4, 2015. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2015-03-04/geopolitics-chinese-aid (accessed 14.01.2019).

16. Kaplan R. D. The revenge of geography: What the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate. New York: Random House, 2012. 432 p.

17. Keohane O. R., Nye S. J. Power and interdependence. 3 rd. ed. New York: Longman 2001. 365 p.

18. Mead W. R. The return of geopolitics. The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers, Foreign Affairs, № 3, 2014. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2014-04-17/return-geopolitics (accessed 14.01.2019).

19. Nye S. J. American Hegemony or American Primacy? Available at: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/american-hegemony-military-superiority-by-josephs--nye-2015-03 (accessed 14.01.2019).

20. Stinchcombе A. L. Constructing Social Theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. 320 р.


Review

For citations:


Aseev A., Shishkov V. Empire in the mirror of geopolitics. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2019;7(1):121-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2019-1-121-127

Views: 907


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-3633 (Print)
ISSN 2713-1645 (Online)