Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)

Advanced search

Comparison of the commodity certification systems in the European Union and in the Eurasian Economic Union

https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2019-1-66-71

Abstract

The article deals with issues of product certification in the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. The objects of study are the economic systems of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. The area of research is the theoretical basis for monitoring the development of economic systems of these associations. According to the authors, the plan for an agreement on economic rapprochement between the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union today seems fantastic. Relations between Russia and the European Union are currently in a significant crisis. Cooperation in the economic field is reduced in terms of mutual sanctions. At the same time, the authors believe that the European Union is capable of playing a major role in solving the issues of improving the states of the Eurasian Economic Union member states, primarily on an economic scale. The role of the Russian food import limit showed the degree of interdependence in foreign trade and the interest of European companies in the normalization of commercial and economic relations. The countries of the world community, including Russia, confirm the unity of their views on the process of harmonization of standards, understanding that in practice harmonized standards guarantee the quality of products and services, the environmentally friendly production and goods, occupational safety, interoperability of products and, if necessary, its interchangeability. In this regard, the issue of harmonization of European and Russian standards of conformity, paperwork for certification and assessment of conformity and quality of exported and imported products, the mechanism of quality management of works and services is relevant. The certification rules in the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union have been analyzed in the article, the CE and EAU marking and problems arising when applying these symbols have been considered, the influence of external (market requirements, competition) and internal (organizational, economic, etc.) factors on development of markets, placement of productive forces, increasing the efficiency of social production have been examined. It has been concluded, that standardization should be perceived as an effective element of the mechanism for managing the quality of products, works and services. This is confirmed by the fact, that the creation and application of harmonized standards allows one to get closer to the benchmarks of sustainable development and to remove many of the modern challenges from the agenda in a timely manner.

About the Authors

Valerii Kardanov
Russian New University
Russian Federation

Candidate of pedagogical sciences



Denis Stoikov
All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences


References

1. Tamozhennyi kodeks Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza (prilozhenie № 1 k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza) / Pod red. G. Yu. Kas’yanovoi [The customs code of the Eurasian Economic Union (annex no 1 to the Treaty on the customs code of the Eurasian Economic Union) / Ed. G. Yu. Kasyanova]. Moscow: ABAK, 2018. 34 p.

2. Dogovor o Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soyuze (podpisan v g. Astane 29.05.2014) (red. ot 11.04.2017) [Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union (signed in Astana on 05.29.2014) (Ed. 04.04.2017)]. Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tantPlyus» [Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons (accessed 08.01.2019).

3. Soglashenie Pravitel’stv gosudarstv – chlenov Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva ot 25.01.2008 г. “O provedenii soglasovannoi politiki v oblasti tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya, sanitarnykh i fitosanitarnykh mer” (red. ot 19.05.2011, s izm. ot 10.10.2014) [The agreement of the governments of the member States of the Eurasian economic community dated 25 January 2008 “On realization of coherent policy in the field of technical regulation, sanitary and phytosanitary measures” (Ed. 19 May 2011, Rev. 10 October 2014)]. Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tantPlyus» [Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons (accessed 08.01.2019).

4. Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 27.12.2018, s izm. ot 04.02.2019) [The code of the Russian Federation about administrative offences dated 30 December 2001 No 195- FZ (as amended on 27 December 2018, Rev. 04 February 2009)]. Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tantPlyus» [Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons (accessed 08.01.2019).

5. Federal’nyi zakon «O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii» ot 27.12.2002 № 184-FZ [Federal law “On technical regulation” of 27 December 2002 No 184-FZ]. Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tantPlyus» [Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”] Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons (accessed 08.01.2019).

6. Direktiva 2006/42/ES [Directive 2006/42/EC]. Available at: http://www.icqc.eu/userfiles/files/directive%202006%2042%20ec%20rus.pdf (accessed 08.01.2019).

7. Vlasenkov G. Yu., Kardanov V. A. Informatsionnaya bezopasnost’ tamozhennykh tekhnologii, Tom 1: monografiya [Information security of customs technologies, volume 1: monograph]. Moscow: Yustitsiya, 2016. 62 p.

8. Kardanov V. A. Pravovaya reglamentatsiya mezhdunarodnykh aviaperevozok gruzov [Legal regulation of international air cargo transportation]. Vestnik RosNOU [Bulletin RosNOU]. 2019. I. 1. pp. 153-159.

9. Nichitenko I. D., Sabiev M. T. Nichitenko I. D. Znak «EAC»: Sravnenie sistem tovarnoi sertifikatsii v EAES i za rubezhom. Sovremennaya ekonomika: aktual’nye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii: sbornik statei XI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, v 2 ch, Ch. 2 [The sign “EAC”: a Comparison of systems of product certification in the EAEU and abroad. Modern Economics: topical issues, achievements and innovations: collection of articles of XI International scientific-practical conference, at 2 ch., Ch. 2]. Penza: MTsNS «Nauka i Prosveshchenie», 2017. 256 p.

10. Raizberg B. A., Lozovskii L. Sh., Starodubtseva E. B. Sovremennyi ekonomicheskii slovar’. 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Modern economic dictionary. 6th ed., rev.]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2011. 602 p.

11. Rumyantsev V. Tekhnicheskoe regulirovanie v ramkakh EAES kak instrument razvitiya vneshnei torgovli Belarusi [Technical regulation within the EAEU as a tool for the development of foreign trade of Belarus]. Nauka i innovatsii [Science and Innovations], 2017, I. 3, pp. 42-46.


Review

For citations:


Kardanov V., Stoikov D. Comparison of the commodity certification systems in the European Union and in the Eurasian Economic Union. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2019;7(1):66-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2019-1-66-71

Views: 728


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-3633 (Print)
ISSN 2713-1645 (Online)