Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)

Advanced search

Ideas of the XX century traditionalism and their significance for the analysis of public administration

https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2025-13-3-141-151

Abstract

The article examines the ideas of the XXI century traditionalism and assesses their significance for analysing the problems of modern state administration. It substantiates the natural appeal to tradition as a source of stability and continuity in the context of globalisation, digitalisation, crisis of trust in institutions, and fragmentation of cultural space. Drawing on the Russian Federation’s historical experience and global philosophical thought, the authors argue that periods of crisis and geopolitical instability encourage the return to traditional foundations that can serve as integrative and legitimising elements in the political order. The focus is on the works of the classics of traditionalism, such as R. Génon, J. Evola, F. Schuon, and M. Eliade, who offered a systematic critique of modern and postmodern. They emphasised the destruction of the sacred and cultural foundations of society under the influence of liberalism, secularism, and globalist unification. Modern interpretations of traditionalism, presented by A. de Benoist, D. Venner, and A.G. Dugin, link these ideas to the problems of information sovereignty, cultural identity, and sustainability of states in the context of globalisation. The authors emphasise that traditionalism cannot be considered as a practical programme for state-building, but its analytical potential lies in the ability to critically examine the categories of power, legitimacy, hierarchy, and relationship between tradition and innovation. It allows us to identify the vulnerabilities of liberal-democratic models, analyse the limits of democratic procedures in unstable environments, and explore cultural identity as a resource for political consolidation. In this way, the ideas of traditionalism are not so much an alternative to modern as an intellectual counter-position that expands the methodological toolkit of political science. Their study contributes to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of legitimising power and finding sustainable models of public administration in the face of the global challenges of the XXI century.

About the Authors

I. V. Goncharova
State University of Management
Russian Federation

Irina V. Goncharova, dr. Sci. (Hist.), Leading Researcher at the Scientific Research Institute of Public Policy and Management of the Sectoral Economy

99, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109542



G. S. Chuwardin
Orel State University named after I.S. Turgenev
Russian Federation

German S. Chuwardin, dr. Sci. (Hist.), Prof. at the Russian History Department

25, Komsomolskaya ulitsa, Orel 302026



V. M. Cherepov
State University of Management
Russian Federation

Viktor M. Cherepov, dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Healthcare and Sports Industry Management Department

99, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109542



References

1. Bogdanov A.V. To understanding of tradition and traditionalism in Western and domestic politico-philosophical thought. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology. 2010;3(10):95–97. (In Russian).

2. De Benoist A. Against liberalism (towards the Fourth political theory). Trans. from Fr. St. Petersburg: Amphora; 2009. 476 p. (In Russian).

3. Dugin A. Philosophy of tradition. Moscow: Arktogeya-Tsenter; 2002. 624 p. (In Russian).

4. Dugin A.G. The Fourth political theory. Russia and political ideas of the XXI century. St. Petersburg: Amphora; 2009. 350 p. (In Russian).

5. Eliade M. Aspects of myth. Moscow: Invest-PPP; 1995. 238 p. (In Russian).

6. Evola J. Pagan imperialism. Trans. from Ger. A. Dugin. Moscow: Arktogeya Historical and Religious Society; 1994. 172 p. (In Russian).

7. Evola J. People and ruins. Fascism viewed from the right. Translated from Spanish by V.V. Vanyushkina. Moscow: AST; Khranitel; 2007. 445 p.

8. Glazkov A.V. Traditionalism as a factor of political stability in modern Russian society. State and Municipal Administration. Scientific Notes. 2024;1:283–288. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-1-283-288

9. Guénon R. Essays on tradition and metaphysics. Trans. from Fr. V.Yu. Bystrov. St. Petersburg: Azbuka; 2000. 317 p. (In Russian).

10. Kovtun N.V. (ed.) Russian traditionalism. History, ideology, poetics, literary reflection. Moscow: Flinta; 2016. 456 p. (In Russian).

11. Plato. Parmenides, Cratylus, and other dialogues. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2014. 550 p. (In Russian).

12. Rogozin E.V. The role of traditionalism in political processes of modern Russia. Abstr. Diss. … Cand. Sci. (Polit.). Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2010. 31 p. (In Russian).

13. Russell B. Human knowledge. Its scope and limits. Trans. from Eng. N.V. Vorobyov. Moscow: Institute of General Humanitarian Studies; 2001. 555 p. (In Russian).

14. Schuon F. Selected works. Kaunas: Baltios Aras; 1996. 586 p. (In Russian).

15. Sedgwick M. Traditionalism. The radical project for restoring sacred order. London: Pelican; 2023. 336 p.

16. Spengler O. The decline of the West. Essays on morphology of world history. Volume 1. Gestalt and reality. Trans. from Ger. K.A. Svasyan. Moscow: Mysl; 1993. 663 p. (In Russian).

17. Torkunov A.V. Russia and political order in a changing world: values, institutions, prospects. Polis. Political Studies. 2022;5:7–22. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.05.02

18. Venner D. Samurai of the West. The table book of the unconquered. Trans. from O. Tabakov. Moscow: Totenburg; 2017. 236 p. (In Russian).

19. Von Hayek F.A. The road to serfdom. Trans. from Eng. Moscow: Economika; 1992. 176 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Goncharova I.V., Chuwardin G.S., Cherepov V.M. Ideas of the XX century traditionalism and their significance for the analysis of public administration. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2025;13(3):141-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2025-13-3-141-151

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-3633 (Print)
ISSN 2713-1645 (Online)