Slowing down and divergence in growth are the barriers to the modern global economy sustainability
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2025-13-2-66-79
Abstract
The factors and mechanisms of the dynamics of global economic growth at the present stage have been analyzed and summarized. Over the past decades, many determinants have increased uncertainty in the global economy development, affecting the decline in aggregate factor productivity through various channels.
The purpose of the study is to assess the mechanisms of deceleration and divergence of global economic growth, which significantly limit sustainable social and economic development in the global economy, as well as to discuss scenarios and ways to prevent a slowdown in global growth.
The challenges of this slowdown for the sustainability of the global economy have been discussed, and new growth trends that emerged in 2022-2024 have been systematized. An additional aspect of the study was the assessment of the negative risks of global economic growth in the future, related to the current concerns about ongoing inflation and recession. The mechanisms that determine the growth divergence and uncertainty have been identified, including using the example of the dynamics observed in individual countries and assessing economic policies implemented in these states (including in terms of countering inflation). Several scenarios of global economic growth for the medium term have been presented, suggesting the opportunities implementation to prevent a slowdown in growth. If growth slows down in the medium term, it will have a negative impact on income convergence between states, as it will become increasingly difficult for poor countries to catch up with rich ones. There are distributional consequences of a slowdown in growth in the medium term for global inequality and wellfare.
About the Author
E. N. SmirnovRussian Federation
Evgeny N. Smirnov, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Department
World Economy and International Economic Relations Department
109542; 99, Ryazansky prospekt; Moscow
References
1. Abiad A. et al. What’s the Damage? Medium-Term Output Dynamics after Banking Crises. IMF Working Paper, No. 09/245. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2009. 37 p.
2. Acemoglu D., Autor D, Patterson C. Bottlenecks: Sectoral Imbalances and the US Productivity Slowdown. NBER Working Paper, No. 31427. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2023. 62 p.
3. Aiyar S., Chen J., Ebeke C. et al. Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism. IMF Staff Discussion Note, No. 2023/001. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2023. 38 p.
4. Andrle M., Hunt B. Model-Based Globally-Consistent Risk Assessment. IMF Working Paper, No. 20/64. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund ; 2020. 27 p.
5. Astinova D. et al. Dissecting the Decline in Average Hours Worked in Europe. IMF Working Paper, No. 24/002. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2024. 44 p.
6. Baqaee D.R., Farhi E. Productivity and Misallocation in General Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2020;1(135):105–163.
7. Bils M., Klenow P.J., Ruane C. Misallocation or Mismeasurement? Journal of Monetary Economics. 2021;124:39–56.
8. Bloom N. et al. Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? American Economic Review. 2020;4(110):1104–1144.
9. Brasili A. et al. Complementarities between Local Public and Private Investment in EU Regions. European Investment Bank Working Paper, No. 2023/04. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank; 2023. 32 p.
10. Brussevich M., Liu S., Papageorgiou C. Income Convergence or Divergence in the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Shock? IMF Working Paper, No. 22/121. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund ; 2022. 33 p.
11. Cazzaniga M. et al. Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work. IMF Staff Discussion Note, No. 24/001. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2024. 39 p.
12. Chancel L., Piketty T. Global Income Inequality, 1820–2020: The Persistence and Mutation of Extreme Inequality. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2021;6(19):3025–3062.
13. Chen K., Irarrazabal A. The Role of Allocative Efficiency in a Decade of Recovery. Review of Economic Dynamics. 2015;3(18):523–550.
14. Chowdhury A., Sundaram J.K. Inflation phobia myths and dogma exacerbate policy responses. Review of Keynesian Economics. 2023;2(11):147–171.
15. Crouzet N., Eberly J.C. Intangibles, Markups, and the Measurement of Productivity Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2021;124:92–109.
16. Decker R.A. et al. Where Has All the Skewness Gone? The Decline in High-Growth (Young) Firms in the United States. European Economic Review. 2016;86:4–23.
17. Dias D.A., Marques C.R., Richmond C. Misallocation and Productivity in the Lead Up to the Eurozone Crisis. Journal of Macroeconomics. 2016;49:46–70.
18. Duval R., Hong G.H., Timmer Y. Financial Frictions and the Great Productivity Slowdown. Review of Financial Studies. 2020;2(33):475–503.
19. Ha D.T., Kiyota K. Misallocation, Productivity, and Trade Liberalization: The Case of Vietnamese Manufacturing. Asian Development Bank Review. 2016;2(33):94–118.
20. Hadzi-Vaskov M., Pienknagura S., Ricci L.A. The Macroeconomic Impact of Social Unrest. IMF Working Paper, No. 21/135. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund ; 2021. 30 p.
21. Hayes C., Jung C. Prices and Profits after the Pandemic. London: Institute for Public Policy Research; 2022. 22 p.
22. Hsieh C.-T., Klenow P. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2009;4(124):1403–1448.
23. Jones C.I. The Outlook for Long-Term Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 31648. Cambridge, MA: NBER; 2023. 12 p.
24. Jones C.I., Klenow P.J. Beyond GDP? Welfare across Countries and Time. American Economic Review. 2016;9(106):2426–2457.
25. Kanunnikova A.M., Karelina E.A. et al. Foreign economic relations of Russia in the context of the world community’s departure from the liberal world order. Novosibirsk: SibAC; 2023. 138 p. (In Russian).
26. Kilic Celik S., Kose M.A., Ohnsorge F. Potential Growth Prospects: Risks, Rewards, and Policies. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 10355. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2023. 60 p.
27. Milanovic B. True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculation Based on Household Surveys Alone. Economic Journal. 2002;112:51–92.
28. Moga I.S. Enterprises’ sustainable development strategies in international business. Novosibirsk: SibAK; 2023. 180 p. (In Russian).
29. Pescatori A. et al. A New Action-Based Dataset of Fiscal Consolidation in OECD Countries. IMF Working Paper, No. 11/128. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2011. 90 p.
30. Restuccia D., Rogerson R. The Causes and Costs of Misallocation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2017;3(31):151–174.
31. Smagulova S.M., Pasko A.V. Differentiation across the modern world economy: rising inequality and global poverty. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo. 2023;2(151):431–436. (In Russian). doi: 10.34925/EIP.2023.151.2.084
32. Syverson C. Challenges to Mismeasurement Explanations for the US Productivity Slowdown. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2017;2(31):165–186.
33. Woo J., Kumar M.S. Public Debt and Growth. Economica. 2015;82(328):705–739.
Review
For citations:
Smirnov E.N. Slowing down and divergence in growth are the barriers to the modern global economy sustainability. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2025;13(2):66-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2025-13-2-66-79