Application of the method for assessing the real efficiency of transport infrastructure for economic comparison of railway track designs

   A method related to improving the tools for evaluating the effectiveness of transport infrastructure, which makes it possible to adequately assess the economic effectiveness of various technical solutions, considering their life cycle and operating conditions, has been developed and tested. The research methodology is based on an economic analysis that includes a life cycle cost calculation. The indicators of capital expenditures, current expenses, risks, and service life of structures were used to compare the variants of technical solutions. The study results show that the proposed assessment method can be used in addition to or instead of the traditional approach and also allows for a comparison of technical solutions. It can be applied when designing new and reconstructing existing transport infrastructure facilities, in particular railway lines, and selecting optimal solutions for various operating conditions. The method is also applicable for evaluating innovative infrastructure solutions. The study prospects are related to the proposed approach integration into the general methodology for analyzing economically significant trends in transport (including railway) infrastructure development, as well as to complement the proposed method with sensitivity analysis of key parameters of the source data. The study highlights the importance of an integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of transport infrastructure, considering both the economic and technical and operational parameters of infrastructure solutions.

1. Ermakov V.M., Bekish A.A. Modern designs of reinforced concrete sleepers and intermediate fastenings for continuous welded track. St. Petersburg: Petersburg State Transport University; 2009. 99 p. (In Russian).

2. Feilo M.B. Comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of investment projects for railway transport development. Bulletin of the IERT Scientific Council. 2019;4:12–17. (In Russian).

3. Galaburda V.G., Sokolov Yu.I., Lavrov I.M., Belozerov V.L., Tereshina N.P., Bubnova G.V. et al. Managing marketing activities in transport. Moscow: Russian University of Transport; 2018. 300 p. (In Russian).

4. Koptyug V.A. Results of the UN Conference on Environment and Development. In: Science will save humanity. Novosibirsk; 1997. Pp. 191–199. (In Russian).

5. Kossov V.V., Livshits V.N., Shakhnazarov A.G. A guideline for assessing the effectiveness of investment projects. Moscow: Ekonomika; 2000. 421 p. (In Russian).

6. Ledney A.Yu. Developing methodological approaches to assessing the economic efficiency of transport infrastructure development, considering the volume and unevenness of transportation. Dis.

7. … Cand. Sci. (Econ.): 08.00.05. Moscow: MIIT; 2020. 176 p. (In Russian).

8. Lukashov V.N., Lukashov N.V. Determining the discount rate for investment design and business valuation: on the difference in calculation and application approaches. Vestnik of St. Petersburg University. Economics. 2019;1(35):83–112. (In Russian).

9. Macheret D.A. Methodological issues of economic research in railway transport. Railway Economics. 2015;3:12–26. (In Russian).

10. Macheret D.A. On economic issues of transport infrastructure development. World of Transport. 2011;3(9):76–83. (In Russian).

11. Macheret D.A., Macheret A.A., Ledney A.Yu., Chernigina I.A. Entrepreneurial activity organization. Moscow: Educational and Methodological Center for Education in Railway Transport; 2023. 256 p. (In Russian).

12. Macheret D.A., Razuvaev A.D. Methodology for improving the assessment of the economic efficiency of transport infrastructure development. Upravlenie / Management (Russia). 2024;3(12):26–35. (In Russian). doi: 10.26425/2309-3633-2024-12-3-26-35

13. Macheret D.A., Razuvaev A.D., Kudryavtseva A.V., Ledney A.Yu. Economic foundations of transport activities, infrastructure and innovative development of transport. Moscow: Prometheus; 2024. 234 p. (In Russian).

14. Menger C. Selected works. Moscow: Territory of the Future Publishing House; 2005. 496 p. (In Russian).

15. Rozhkov A.D. Assessing socio-economic effects from investment projects implementation (new Nizhny Bestyakh – Magadan railway line case). Bulletin of the IERT Scientific Council. 2022;7:33–38. (In Russian).

16. Savin A.V. Conditions for applying ballastless track. Dis. … Dr. Sci. (Engr.): 05.22.06. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State Transport University; 2018. 444 p. (In Russian).

17. Savin A.V., Razuvaev A.D. Areas of ballastless track application. Bulletin of the Institute for Problems of Natural Monopolies: Railway Engineering. 2016;3(35):32–41. (In Russian).

18. Shestakova E.B., Kazaku E.V. Assessing budget efficiency of investments in railway infrastructure reconstruction projects. Track Navigator. 2022;53(79):50–59. (In Russian).

19. Shestakova E.B., Kazaku E.V. Assessing the effectiveness of investment projects for transport infrastructure development. Track Navigator. 2022;52(78):62–73. (In Russian).

20. Slavinsky P.G. Railway construction with an outline of approximate cost estimates for constructing tracks, maintaining them and transporting goods. St. Petersburg; 1858. 38 p. (In Russian).

21. Stepanov A.A., Ignatova Ya.S., Merenkov A.O., Lastochkina G.A., Malkova A.V. Engineering and management approach in the sphere of transport and logistics. Vestnik universiteta. 2024;3:69–77. (In Russian). doi: 10.26425/1816-4277-2024-3-69-77

22. Tsypin P.E., Razuvaev A.D. Ballastless track design: history, present, development prospects in Russia. Transport of the Russian Federation. 2018;1(74):66–70. (In Russian).