On some current aspects and new approaches to scientific understanding of the national characteristics of Russian statehood formation and evolution
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2024-12-2-91-98
Abstract
The object of the study is the process of Russian statehood formation and historical transformation.
The subject of the study is the analysis of existing in the Russian scientific and public thought (pre-revolutionary and modern) different approaches to the interpretation of national features of Russian statehood foundations origin and evolution.
The authors emphasize a number of fundamental problems of Russian statehood development, which today require creative comprehension by scientific community. The article substantiates the position on the enduring significance of domestic researchers’ and thinkers’ conclusions about the uniqueness of the process of Russian statehood foundations origin in the Old Russian state, which was fundamentally different from similar processes in Western states, the Tsardom of Muscovy political system specificity, which consisted in the cathedral structure of the state and received ideological justification in the “autocratic sobornost” doctrine. Special attention has been paid to the conclusions related to assessing significance of the long coexistence in the Russian state of two parallel beginnings such as the monarchical vertical of power and the rich veche tradition, which compensated for the relative weakness of the monarchy in technical and political sense. For the first time the issue of what place in Russian statehood transformation was occupied by the Time of Troubles of the early 17th century has been investigated in detail. Attention has been drawn to the conclusions of pre-revolutionary scientists and thinkers about the determining role of the Time of Troubles, which it played in the new attitudes’ formation to the state and state power in Russian society, including in the context of modern interpretations. The determining role of zemstvo bodies in the years of the Time of Troubles in the collapsing state preservation and revival has been pointed out. The conclusion has been made about the similarity of the Russian system of power with the Byzantine model, traditionally characterized by a combination of a rigid monarchical vertical and horizontal of developed self-government. The role of the state idea uniting society in preserving stability and sustainability of any state has been emphasized.
About the Authors
N. A. OmelchenkoRussian Federation
Nikolai A. Omelchenko, Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Head of the Department
Public Administration and Political Technologies Department
109542; 99, Ryazansky prospekt; Moscow
T. V. Rastimeshina
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Rastimeshina, Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Head of the Department
Political Science and Applied Political Work Department
129226; 4b1, Wilhelm Pieck ul.; Moscow
Yu. V. Sinchuk
Russian Federation
Yuri V. Sinchuk, Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Prof., Prof. at the Department
International Relations and Foreign Policy Department; Theory of Management Organization Department
119034; 38, Ostozhenka ul.; Moscow; 140155; Elektroizolyator pos., 67
References
1. Alekseev Yu.G. Sudebnik of Ivan III. Traditions and reform. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin; 2001. 446 p. (In Russian).
2. Berdyaev N. The Fate of Russia. Experiments on the psychology of war and nationality. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ. House; 1990. 240 p. (In Russian).
3. Gaponenko L.B. The construction of national identity in the context of the politics of memory. Discourse-P. 2020;3(40):40–53. (In Russian). doi: 10.24411/1817-9568-2020-10303
4. Dvornichenko A.Yu. To the problem of East Slavic politogenesis. Early forms of political organization. From primitiveness to statehood. Moscow: Oriental Literature; 1995. 350 p. (In Russian).
5. Karamzin N.M. Note on ancient and new Russia in its political and civil relations. Moscow: Nauka; 1991. 127 p. (In Russian).
6. Krivosheev Yu.V. Rus and Mongols: Studies on the History of North-Eastern Russia in 12–15<sup>th</sup> centuries. 3<sup>rd</sup> edition, revised and enlarged. St. Petersburg: Academy of Culture Research; 2015. 452 p. (In Russian).
7. Kuzmin A.G. Marauders on the roads of history. Moscow: Russkaya Panorama; 2005. 334 p. (In Russian).
8. Omelchenko N.A., Perevezentsev S.V., Veselov A.A. et al. History of Russia : in 4 vol. Vol. 1. Genesis and evolution of Russian statehood (up to the end of the 17<sup>th</sup> century). Moscow: INFRA-M; 2018. 679 p. (In Russian).
9. Omelchenko N.A. The Turmoil in the Moscow State at the Beginning of the XVII Century and Its Influence on the Transformation of the Foundations and Principles of Russian Statehood (Political Science Aspect). RUDN Journal. Series: State and Municipal Management. 2023;1(10):7–17. (In Russian). doi: 10.22363/2312-8313-2023-10-1-7-17
10. Platonov S.F. Lectures on Russian History by Professor S.F. Platonov, Dr. of Russian History, read in 1899–1900 academic year at the Alexander Military Law Academy, the Imperial St. Petersburg University and at the Higher Women’s Courses. St. Petersburg; 1900. (In Russian).
11. Fedotov G.P. Fate and Sins of Russia : in 2 vol. St. Petersburg: Sofia; 1993. (In Russian).
12. Frank S.L. From Reflections on the Russian Revolution. Books VI–VIII. Russkaya mysl; 1923. (In Russian).
13. Shalak M.E. The Time of Troubles in the assessments of Russian contemporaries and historical consciousness of Russian society in the 17<sup>th</sup> century. Bulletin of Higher Education Institutes. North Caucasus Region. Social Sciences. 2004;1:36–40. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Omelchenko N.A., Rastimeshina T.V., Sinchuk Yu.V. On some current aspects and new approaches to scientific understanding of the national characteristics of Russian statehood formation and evolution. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2024;12(2):91-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2024-12-2-91-98