Regional economic integration in the Eurasian Economic Union: theory, lessons from the past and new opportunities
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-2-95-102
Abstract
The article shows that the processes of world development initiate changes in various areas of international cooperation both at the global and regional levels. This is also happening within the framework of regional economic integration cooperation. The author proves that the modern transformation of integration processes has an impact on the development of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). This process requires a comprehensive theoretical analysis and systematization. The purpose of the article is to analyze and evaluate integration processes in the EAEU. The scientific novelty of the article is the systematization of new phenomena and characteristics in regional economic integration in the world in the 21st century. The author also tries to formulate new tasks for the EAEU in building a progressive integration process. Another point of view, which the author substantiates in the article, is that the foundation for the development of integration in the EAEU should be taking into account ongoing global changes, previous experience of economic integration within the framework of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (Comecon) and the development of industrial cooperation between the EAEU countries and non-regional partners both in industry, and in agriculture, that means, in the real sectors of the economy. The author concludes that it is production cooperation in the real sectors of the economy in the EAEU that will ensure the necessary stability of both national economies and the progressive development of the integration process in the current conditions of the world economic process increased turbulence and the global system transformation. And since the EAEU faces such large-scale and vital tasks, then, according to the author, a reassessment and some redirection of integration efforts are required. It is on this basis that an adequate formation of new principles of financial cooperation in the EAEU is possible.
About the Author
L. V. ShkvaryaRussian Federation
Lyudmila V. Shkvarya, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. at the World Economy Department, Head of the World Economy Dynamics Laboratory
36, Stremyannyi pereulok, Moscow 117997, Russia
References
1. Bhagwati J. (1991), The world trading system at risk, Princeton University and Harvester Wheatsheaf, US, 156 p.
2. Frolova E.D., Kozhevnikov K.I. (2022), “The pool of Arab countries of Western Asia as an ‘enclave of globality’”, Russia and Asia, no. 4(18), pp. 35–44. (In Russian).
3. Glazyev S. (2020), “On the underlying causes of growing chaos and measures of the economic crisis overcoming”, Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics, no. 2, pp. 11–22, https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2020-2-11-22 (in Russian).
4. Golikova Yu.A. (2012), Corporate education in industry in the context of economic integration (theory and methodology). Abstr. Diss. ... D-r Sci. (Econ,): 08.00.05., St. Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance; St. Petersburg. 41 p. (In Russian).
5. Kasimov O.B. (2009), “Theory and practice of economic integration in the framework of globalization”, Vestnik of the Saratov State Socia-Economic University, vol. 4, no. 28, pp. 57–59. (In Russian).
6. Khalid S.A. (2015), GCCs Economic Cooperation and Integration: Achievements and Hurdles, AlJazeera Centre for Studies, Mecca, Saudi Arabia, 223 p.
7. Khasbulatov R.I. (2019), International and continental-regional economic integration: forms, types, contradictions, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics Publ. House, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
8. Maksimova M.M. (1969), “Economic integration: some issues of methodology”, World Economy and International Relations, no. 5, pp. 16–28. (In Russian).
9. Maltsev A.A. (2023), “Industrial sector contribution to overall economic growth in modern world practice”, Russian Foreign Economic Journal, no. 3, pp. 10–28. (In Russian).
10. Shkvarya L.V., Tyrkba Kh.V. (2016), “Overview of China- ASEAN economic relations” // In: BRICS: Cooperation for development. Education. The science. Business. Proceedings of the V International Scientific Conference. BRICS National Research Committee; People’s Friendship University of Russia, Moscow June 4, 2015, People’s Friendship University of Russia Publ. House, Moscow, Russia. Pp. 86–89.
11. Shkvarya L.V., Yu H. (2022), “Belt and Road Initiative and China’s Economic Challenges”, Research in Economic Anthropology, no. 42, pp. 93–101, https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120220000042010
12. Spartak A.N. (2010), “Development and international legal regulation of regional economic integration processes: new trends and phenomena at the beginning of the XXI century”, Russian Foreign Economic Journal, no. 7, pp. 28–37. (In Russian).
13. Timofeev A.V. (2012), “Theoretical aspects and trends of regional economic integration”, Vestnik of the Saratov State Socia-Economic University, vol. 3, no. 42, pp. 58–63. (In Russian).
14. Vasilevskaya V.E. (2022), “Theory of international economic integration: neoliberal school”, In: Masyutkin E.P. et al. (ed.). Society, education, science in modern development paradigms. Proceedings of the III National Scientific and Practical Conference, Kerch, October 17–18, 2022. Kerch State Maritime Technological University, Kerch, Crimea. Pp. 302–306. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Shkvarya L.V. Regional economic integration in the Eurasian Economic Union: theory, lessons from the past and new opportunities. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2023;11(2):95-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-2-95-102