Structure and subjects of information policy

The article substantiates the importance of information policy for the sustainable development of the state and society. The analysis of the information policy structure and its formation within the framework of the international agenda is carried out, considering the interests of all countries. The requirements for the analysis of information policy and its concept on the basis of objects existing in the information space are determined. The main approaches to the definition of objects of information policy are revealed. The problem of the relationship between the state and society in the context of information policy is considered. The importance of the interaction of social and information systems and its influence on public opinion is substantiated. The concept of information policy subject is interpreted from the political science and philosophy point of view. The main difficulties in understanding this definition are highlighted due to the differences between social and information spaces. The main types of subjects in the political sphere that are actively involved in the political process, representing individual, group and institutional actors, are given. The influence of modern trends on the composition of political subjects is described. Types of information policy subjects analysis and classification are carried out. The use of the information space by terrorist and extremist organizations deprived of their official status for their own purposes is analyzed.

1. Bogomolova V.O. (2019), “Problems of economic analysis in enterprises”, In: Contribution of young scientists to the innovative development of the Russian agro-industrial complex: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists, Penza, October 24–25, 2019. Penza: Penza State Agrarian University, pp. 161–164. (In Russian).

2. Fedotov N.A. (2003), “Information culture in the system of information policy of modern Russian society”: Abstr. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Polit.): 23.00.02 “Political institutions, processes and technologies”, Sholokhov Moscow State University for Humanities, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

3. Frolov E.V. (2005), “Political image of state institutions in Russia (Current state and prospects for improvement)”: Abstr. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Polit.): 23.00.02 “Political institutions, processes and technologies”, Academy of Water Transport, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

4. Kovalev A.A. (2016), “Theoretical analysis of information policy”, Young Scientist, no. 14 (118), pp. 496–501. (In Russian).

5. Kuzmina E.V., Shevchenko S.A., Kuzmina M.I., Agievich T.G., Moskalev Y.A. (2021), “Information policy as a tool for sustainable regional development in the context of digital transformation”, Journal of economy and entrepreneurship, no. 2(127), pp. 350–353, https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2021.127.2.067 (in Russian).

6. Nisnevich Yu.A. (2004) “‘Electronic government’ as a post-industrial philosophy of public administration”, Theory and practice of social and scientific information, no. 19, pp. 153–170. (In Russian).

7. Ortega y Gasset J. (1992), “Old and new politics”, Political Studies, no. 3, pp. 133–141. (In Russian).

8. Polyanichko V.A., Ochitkova E.S., Ochitkova V.P. (2021), “Key competencies of the head of an educational organization”, Science and modern society: current issues, achievements, and innovations: Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference, Penza, November 30, 2021. Penza: Nauka i Prosveshchenie (IP Gulyaev G.Yu.), pp. 175–177. (In Russian).

9. Rosenau J. (2008), “Quantification means a discovery of recurring pattern”, Mezhdunarodnye processy, vol. 6, no. 3(18), pp. 67–72.

10. Shitova M.A. (2020), “State information policy as an aspect of public administration in the information society in the Russian federation ”, Russian State Studies, no. 1, pp. 67–74. (In Russian).

11. Soloviev A.I. (2005), “Policy and management: cognitive basis of correlation”, Moscow University Bulletin. Series 21. Public Administration, no. 3, pp. 36–49. (In Russian).

12. Stakhanov D.V., Mechikova, M. N., Novikov, N. A. (2013), “Logistic management in enterprises production sector in the region”, Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, no. 1, pp. 45–50, https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2013-1-45-50 (in Russian).

13. Sudorgin O.A. (2011), “Modern information policy of the state: world experience and Russian practice”: Abstr. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Polit.): 23.00.02 “Political institutions, processes and technologies”, State Specialized Institute of Arts, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

14. Tsuladze A.M. (1997), “Formation of the political leader’s image in the conditions of the formation of a new political system in Russia”: Abstr. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Polit.): 23.00.02 “Political institutions, processes and technologies”, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).