Research of technological interaction methods between expert structures and political institutions

The article analyzes the current state of interaction between political institutions and the expert community. This scientific research was conducted in the form of an interview. The respondents were members of expert communities, both non-governmental structures and representatives of expert structures under state authorities, as well as representatives of political institutions. Interview questions reveal a set of competencies that are necessary in order to be fully called a professional expert, attracted by political institutions to build a dialogue and help in the formation of effective public policy. The questions also related to the current situation with the rotation of the composition of experts in expert structures. The opinion of experts and representatives of political institutions was studied on what improvements and mechanisms should be implemented and adjusted to build productive and effective interaction between expert communities and representatives of political institutions. The relevance of the research lies in the analysis of the answers to these questions. The logical purpose of the work is to form an understanding of a number of modern problems faced by both experts and representatives of political institutions at the current stage of development of their interaction in the formation of public policy.

1. Bronnikov I.A., Gimazova Yu.V. (2019), “The interaction of the authorities and experts in Russia: the state, risks and prospects”, Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, no. 49, pp. 162–169, https://doi. org/10.17223/1998863X/49/16 (in Russian).

2. Dolzhenko R.A., Dolzhenko S.B. (2019), “Development of professional communities and their role in solving socio-economic problems”, Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”, vol. 17, no. 3. pp. 77–87, https://doi.org/10.25513/1812- 3988.2019.17 (3).77-87 (in Russian).

3. Grabelnykh T.I., Lesnikovskaya E.V., Parkhomenko A.N., Sablina N.A. (2018), “Civil society and state: the institution of public control in the light of modern research practices in Irkutsk region”, Vestnik Universiteta, no. 1, pp. 156–161, https:// doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-1-156-161 (in Russian).

4. Ivchenkova M.S. (2020), “Expert knowledge in regional governance”, Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Sociology. Politology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 264–267, https://doi.org/10.18500/1818- 9601-2020-20-3-264-267 (in Russian).

5. Krasheninnikova Yu.A. (2019), “The Problems of Ensuring the Quality ofExperts’ Work: the Case of Media Content Evaluation in the Russian Federation”, Administrative Consulting, no. 3(123), pp. 87–103, https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139- 2019-3-87-103 (in Russian).

6. Ravochkin N.N., Bobrikov V.N. (2020), “Networks of modern intellectuals in pursuit of overcoming crisis trends: theoretical-applied aspect”, Sociodynamics, no. 7, pp. 74–90, https:// doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2020.7.33460 (in Russian).

7. Sungurov A.Yu. (2015), “Authorities and expert community: the institutionsand practices of cooperation in the Russian regions”, Power and elites, no. 2, pp. 190–208, (in Russian).

8. Sungurov A.Yu., Dubrovsky D.V., Karyagin M.E., Tinyakov D.K. (2020), “Public-consulatative councils as a way of involving expert knowledge in policy decision process (case of St. Petersburg)”, Public Administration Issues, no. 2, pp. 7–31, (in Russian).

9. Tselyutina T.V. (2018), “Convergence of the representation of expert institutions in the management of public processes” [“Konvergentsiya predstavitel’stva ekspertnykh institutov v upravlenii obshchestvennymi protsessami”], Russia: Trends and Prospects of Development [Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya], no. 13-2, pp. 581–585, (in Russian).

10. Znamensky D.Yu. (2018), “Russian national model of public policy: structure and special features”, Upravlenie / MANAGEMENT (Russia), vol. 6, no. 2 (20), pp. 61–66, (in Russian).