Intellectual measurement and evaluation of the results of customs authorities’ activities
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-1-16-28
Abstract
The new Strategy for the Development of the Customs Service of the Russian Federation until 2030 calls optimization and improvement of customs administration as one of its fundamental principles. The emerging trend leads to an increase in the obligatoriness of the development of formalized means of modeling and analysis of management processes in the customs sphere. Performance measurement is one of the most effective management tools. In this article, the authors, taking as a basis the basic provisions of the National Technological Initiative, continued mapping the problem of measuring the results of the customs authorities functioning in key areas of their activities in the context of the qualitological system transformation of the customs institution, due to the process of its intellectualization in the digital economy. The purpose of the study is to create a model for measuring the results of the customs authorities’ activities. To specify the general methodology, a model for measuring the degree of achievement the goal in the “Finance” direction is described. The study is based on a cognitive approach that allows describing the intellectual environment of customs authorities and models of evaluation and management based on fuzzy logic algorithms. The implementation of the technology for presenting experts’ knowledge in the subject area is carried out on the basis of constructing a prescriptive logical production model that allows formalizing expert knowledge in the form of implicative statements involving fuzzy formulations in antecedents and consequents, and using a generalized modus ponens as a logical conclusion. Computer development of a mathematical model is carried out in the Fuzzy Logic Toolbox for Matlab application software package.
About the Authors
G. I. GoremykinaRussian Federation
Galina I. Goremykina, Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Assoc. Prof. at the Mathematical Methods in Economics Department
36, Stremyanny per., Moscow 117997
Yu. E. Gupanova
Russian Federation
Yuliya E. Gupanova, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. at the Economics of Customs Department
4, Komsomolsky prospekt, Lyubertsy, Moscow Oblast 140015
References
1. Bobrova A.V. (2017), “Assessment of the performance of Russian customs authorities”, World Customs Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 37–48.
2. Boykova M.V., Gubarev D.V. (2021), “On the issue of digital transformation of customs administration” // Scientific Notes of the St. Petersburg Branch of the Russian Customs Academy named after V.B. Bobkov [Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo imeni V.B. Bobkova filiala Rossijskoj tamozhennoj akademii], no. 2(78), pp. 69–73, (in Russian).
3. Boltürk E. (2022), “Fuzzy sets theory and applications in engineering economy”, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 37–46, https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-219173
4. Feng S. (2022), Automation Control System Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology. In: Hung J.C., Chang J.W., Pei Y., Wu W.C. (eds.) Innovative Computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 791, pp. 783–791, Springer, Singapore, https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4258-6_96.
5. Finn V.K. (2020), “Exact Epistemology and Artificial Intelligence”, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 140–173, https://doi.org/10.3103/ S0005105520030073
6. Fomin G.P., Sukhorukova I.V., Maksimov D.A., Aleshina I.F. (2022), “Formation of indicators, criteria, measures and risk assessment scales”, Soft measurements and calculations [Myagkie izmereniya i vychisleniya], vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 5–10, https://doi. org/10.36871/2618-9976.2022.03.001, (in Russian).
7. Goremykina G.I. (2021), “Big Data mining. A computer-oriented method ofworking with the semantics of assertions”, Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 880–888, https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.17.202104.880-888, (in Russian)
8. Goremykina G.I., Gupanova Yu.E. (2018), “Outlining the methodology for management by objectives in line with performance results of the customs service”, National Interests: Priorities and Security, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1996–2011, https://doi. org/10.24891/ni.14.11.1996, (in Russian).
9. Goremykina G.I., Gupanova Yu.E., Udalova Z.V. (2019), “Intelligent management methodology based on the performance results of customs authorities”, In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific Conference on Agricultural Machinery Industry, INTERAGROMASH 2019, Rostov-on-Don September 10–13, 2019. Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, art. num. 012129 (in Russian)
10. Groshev I.V., Zheregelya A.V. (2021), “Digital transformation of the economy: changing business practices and digital leadership”, Management in Russia and abroad, no. 3, pp. 10–17, (in Russian).
11. Makrusev V.V., Ryzhova A.S. (2021), “Self-development of cognitive customs technologies as a dominant factor in the development of customs systems”, Economic research and development [Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya i razrabotki], no. 2, pp. 13–19, (in Russian).
12. Makrusev V.V., Savda Y.Yu., Boykova M.V., Suglobov A.E. (2018), “Customs management as an institute: studying development trends”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), no. 10 (2), pp. 1802–1809.
13. Mamdani E.H., Assilian S. (1975), “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, https://doi. org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
14. Mikheyenkova, M.A. (2020). Cognitive knowledge discovery in social sciences, In: Golenkov V., Krasnoproshin V., Golovko V., Azarov E. (eds.) Open Semantic Technologies for Intelligent System. OSTIS 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science. V. 1282. Springer, Cham., https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-60447-9_4
15. Morales-Fusco P., Sauri S., Lekka A.-M., Karousos J. (2016), “Assessing customs performance in the mediterranean ports. KPI selection and best practices identification as part of the MEDNET Project”, Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 18, pp. 374–383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.049
16. Piegat A. (2011), Fuzzy Modeling and Control, Physica– Verlag, A Springer–Verlag Company, Heidelberg. Post E.L. (1943), “Formal Reductions of the General Combination Decision Problem”, American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 65, pp. 197–215.
17. Prokopchina S.V. (2021), “Intelligent measurements as a promising way to integrate and jointly develop artificial intelligence methodologies and measurement theory”, Soft measurements and calculations [Myagkie izmereniya i vychisleniya], vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 5–17, https://doi.org/10.36871/2618-9976.2021.01.001, (in Russian).
18. Sinchukov A.V. (2022), “General issues of designing and managing a portfolio of financial instruments”, Scientific research and development. Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 36–43, https:// doi.org/10.12737/2587-9111-2022-10-1-36-43, (in Russian).
19. Yudina M.A., Kamaeva L.O. (2021), “Formation and development of a system for the evaluation of customs activities”, Problems of theory and practice of management [Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya], no. 1, pp. 113–128, https://doi. org/10.46486/0234-4505-2021-1-113-128, (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Goremykina G.I., Gupanova Yu.E. Intellectual measurement and evaluation of the results of customs authorities’ activities. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2023;11(1):16-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-1-16-28