State of the object and state’s indicators. Problems of personnel management
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-2-43-50
Abstract
The article substantiates the thesis that in personnel management it is necessary to distinguish between the object state and the object state indicators. The study of employee behavior from the standpoint of a system-transdisciplinary approach allowed us to conclude that any employee strives for stability and self-preservation. The condition for maintaining the stability and development of the employee is to achieve the indicators that the manager gives him. However, this doesn’t always change the object state. The main problem of personnel management is the development of a set of indicators, in which, working on indicators, employees would change the state of the organization in the right direction. The interpretation of economic relations as a system allows us to designate their basic element as a household. Then the objective function of economic relations is to meet the needs of all households. It is shown that the existing system of monetary indicators at the state level cannot provide an increase in the well-being of all households. The necessity of developing evaluation indicators of the activities of decision-makers and managers based on the designated system goal of the development of the national economy is justified. The problems of developing indicators and ways to solve them are also outlined.
About the Authors
M. S. Mokiy
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Michael S. Mokiy, Dr. Sci (Econ.), at the Department of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Forecasting, Economic Theory
99, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109542
M. E. Cortés
Autonomous University of Madrid
Spain
Spain
María Escat Cortés, PhD (Econ.), Prof.
Madrid 28049
References
1. Adams J.S. (1965), “Inequality in social exchange”, In: Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, New York, Academic Press, pp. 267–299.
2. Atkinson J.W. (1957), “Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior”, Psychological Review, no. 64 (6, Pt.1), 359–372, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
3. Borzenko E.K. (2018), “Evaluation of the effectiveness of the activities of state corporations”, Topical issues of the national economy: the view of young scientists, Bulletin of the Department of National Economy 2/2018, Publ. House RANEPA “Delo”, Moscow, pp. 59–68.
4. Cotter. J. (2011)? Matsushita's leadership.Lessons of an outstanding entepreneur of the XX century, trans. from Eng., Alpina Publisher, Moscow, 256 p. (In Russian).
5. Herzberg F., Mausner B. and Snyderman B. (1959), Motivation to work, 2nd ed., John Wiley, New York.
6. Kahneman D. (1973), Attention and effort, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
7. Maslow A.A. (1943), “Theory human of motivation”, Psychological Review, no. 50, p. 370–396.
8. McGregor D.M. (1966), Leadership and Motivation, M.I.T Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. Mokiy M.S. (2018), “Ontological problems of the system approach”, Proceedings of the 41st International Conference of the Scientific
10. School-Seminar named after Academician S.S. Shatalin, Eds. V.G. Grebennikova and I.N. Shchepkina 116 p. (In Russian).
11. Mokiy M.S., Nikiforov A.L. and Mokiy V.S. (2020), The methodology of scientific research: A textbook for masters, Yurait, Moscow. (In Russian).
12. Ouchi W.G. (1981), Theory Z, Avon Books, New York.
13. Parra-Luna F. (2018), “A Systemic Index of Human Development: In Search of World Peace from Harmony”, Avances Sistémicos, no. 3, available at: https://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=838 (accessed 03.02.2022).
14. Siebert H. (2005), The cobra effect: How to avoid delusions in economic policy [Der Kobra Effekt], trans. from Germ., New Publ. House, Moscow. (In Russian).
15. Thaler R.H. (2015), Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
16. Vroom V.H. and Deci E.L. (ed.) (1970), Management and Motivation, Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth.
Review
For citations:
Mokiy M.S., Cortés M.E. State of the object and state’s indicators. Problems of personnel management. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2022;10(2):43-50. https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-2-43-50
Views:
436
Email this article 