New paradigm of a company’s competitiveness: complex approach
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-1-36-41
Abstract
The issues of competitiveness such as why some companies reach success, while others not, how companies differ and how they are managed within the chosen strategies to reach the state of competitiveness are the key for the organization of any type and industry. Some researches had a tendency to fragment or disintegrate the important parts of this problem, but the purpose of this paper is to integrate the main elements of the competitiveness phenomenon into the complex system and offer a wide practical view over the cornerstones of a company’s competitiveness in a contemporary environment. In this article the author reveals her understanding of the concept of modern company’s competitiveness, then in the main part offers the qualitative model – the system of company’s competitiveness which should lead to financial competitiveness. The presented framework is practice-oriented and based on factors and efforts that depend on the company itself, but goes beyond the resource-based view or a particular single strategy school, highlighting the importance of a complex approach.
About the Author
V. I. Pyatanova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria I. PyatanovaCand. Sci. (Econ.), MBA (University of Cambridge), Head of Financial Management Department
36, Stremyanny lane, Moscow 117997,
References
1. Chikan A. (2008), “National and firm competitiveness: a general research model”, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, vol. 18, no. 1/2, pp. 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595420810874583
2. Krugman P. (1994), “Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 28–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917
3. Mintzberg H, Lampel J., Ahistrand B. (2013), Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management, trans. from Eng. D. Raevskaya, L. Tsaruk, Alpina Publisher, Moscow, Russia. (Series “Skolkovo”). (In Russian).
4. Porter M. (1985), Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, Free Press, New York, USA; Collier Macmillan, London, UK.
5. Porter M. (1991), “Towards a dynamic theory of strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12, no. s 2, pp. 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.4250121008
6. Porter M. (1996), “What is strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 61–78.
7. Prahalad C., Hamel G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30763-X_14
8. Pyatanova V.I. (2021), “Evolvement of the company’s competitiveness concept in the context of development of strategic thought”, Mikroekonomika, no. 5, pp. 36–43. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33917/mic-5.100.2021.36-43
Review
For citations:
Pyatanova V.I. New paradigm of a company’s competitiveness: complex approach. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2022;10(1):36-41. https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-1-36-41
Views:
327
Email this article 