Business strategy design methodologies: from product design to platform design
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2021-9-2-76-89
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of modern methodologies that are successfully used for the development of innovative products and ecosystem platforms. The paper describes the tools of the “Jobs To Be Done” approach. The author highlights the differences between the two concepts “Jobs-As-Activities” and “Jobs-As-Progress”. The study emphasizes the importance of studying the digital client path. The publication presents by step-by-step an algorithm for constructing a strategy for bringing a new offer to the market based on the “Jobs To Be Done” method. The article presents examples of filling in the Job stories Canvas, interview framework in “Jobs To Be Done” format, Process Making Forces Canvas.
The study shows the tools that are successfully used in creating a business strategy based on an ecosystem platform. The paper substantiates the importance of customer-oriented approach and switching to an ecosystem approach to the development of a business model. The author highlights the benefits from the ecosystem of the user, business owner and partners.
The study gives an overview of ecosystem types according to the Gartner classification with examples in Russian ecosystems. The author provides tools of the Platform Design (Platform Innovation Kit) which allow you to develop an integrated environment for the development of the customer experience, to improve consumer goods and services: VRIO framework, a Matrix of Motivation, the Ecosystem Platform Relations Canvas, Training Mechanism Canvas, Value Proposition Canvas and Platform Business Models Canvas. These tools expand the design thinking portfolio.
About the Author
E. V. Vasilieva
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Vasilieva, Dr. Sciw. (Econ.)
49, GSP-3, Leningradskiy pr-t., Moscow 125993
References
1. Auernhammer J., Liu W., Ohashi T., Leifer L., Byler E. and Pan W. (2021), “Neurodesign: Embracing neuroscience instruments to investigate human collaboration in design”, In: Ahram T., Taiar R., Langlois K., Choplin A. (eds) Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications III. IHIET 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, V. 1253, pp. 284–289. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55307-4_43
2. Balina T., Dagaeva E. and Novi I. (2020), “Research of the informational needs of state and municipal employees in the university environment”, International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, no. 5 (2), pp. 134–144. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2020.2.134
3. Blank S. (2014), The four steps to the epiphany: Successful strategies for products that win, Al’pina Publisher, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
4. Christensen C. M., Dillon K. and Hall T. (2016), Competing against luck: the story of innovation and customer choice, Kindle, New York, USA.
5. Chung G. and Chung D. (2018), “WOW the hospitality customers: Transforming innovation into performance through design thinking and human performance technology”, Performance Improvement, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21772
6. Demssie Y.N., Biemans H.J., Wesselink R. and Mulder M. (2020), “Combining indigenous knowledge and modern education to foster sustainability competencies: towards a set of learning design principles”, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 17, art. num. 6823, 20 p; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176823
7. Dneprovskaya N.V. (2020), “The method to study the competencies of the subjects of the digital economy”, Open Education,no. 24 (1), pp. 4–12. (In Russian).
8. Fazylzyanova G.I. (2020), “Design-thinking as a philosophy and methodology of the digital society”, Economical and SocialHumanitarian Research, no. 1 (25), pp. 101–108. (In Russian).
9. Ge X.and Leifer L.(2020), “When tough times make tough designers: How perplexing experiences shape engineers’ knowledge and identity”, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol .36, no. 2, pp. 650–663.
10. Jamal T., Kircher J. and Donaldson J.P. (2021), “Re-visiting design thinking for learning and practice: Critical pedagogy, conative empathy”, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 2, art. num. 964, 26 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020964
11. Kelley T. and Kelley D. (2013), Creative confidence unleashing the creative potential within us all, Barnes & Noble, New York, USA. 288 p.
12. Klement A. (2018), When coffee and kale compete. Become great at making products people will buy, Create Space Independent Publishing Platform. 227 р.
13. Levrik M., Link P. and Leifer L. (2018), The design thinking playbook: mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems, Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian).
14. MauryaA. (2012), Running lean: iterate from plan A to a plan that works, O’Reilly Media, CA.
15. Rudenko Yu.S. and Eliseeva T. (2012), “Conceptual features of management of modern network economic structures on a basis foresight researches in the conditions of accruing globalization and the modern information environment”, Kachestvo. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie, no. 6 (85), pp. 79–83. (In Russian).
16. Sharin V.I. (2020), “Career risks in the civil service”, Public Administration. E-Journal, no. 78, pp. 302–318. (In Russian).
17. Senge P., Kleiner A., Roberts Ch., Ross R., Roth G. and Smith B. (1999), “The dance of change: the challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations, Performance Improvement, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140380511
18. Ulwick A.W. and Osterwalder A. (2016), Jobs to be done: theory to practice, Idea by Press, New York, USA.
19. Vasilieva E.V. (2018), Design thinking: a little about the approach and a lot about tools for developing creative thinking, studying customer requests and creating ideas: monograph, Rusains, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
20. Vasilieva E.V. (2020), “Design thinking in managing the dynamics of group intellectual work”,Upravlenie, no. 8 (3), pp. 53–61. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Vasilieva E.V. Business strategy design methodologies: from product design to platform design. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2021;9(2):76-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2021-9-2-76-89
Views:
1249
Email this article 