Analysis of change management experience in organizations
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-8-3-24-32
Abstract
The article considers the issues of change management taking into account the Russian and American experience. Change management has been reviewed as an integral part of the management theory. It has been proposed to consider the process of change management as primarily the management of phenomena that accompany the process of change.
The concept of “change” has been reflected as a process of transformation and as the transformation of an object into new legal forms through reorganization. The presented experience of managing American companies shows, first of all, the situation in which economic growth is carried out and all transformations are aimed at integration processes.
The analysis of modern experience of change management has been made in the context of crisis situations that require flexibility in managing all processes in the organization. The article presents a division of changes into groups, allowing you to identify areas that require timely management influence when developing an organization’s development program.
The analysis examines the most popular change management models and the actions of companies to manage changes during the coronavirus pandemic.
In conclusion, it has been concluded that for modern companies, change management requires not only constant analysis of internal organizational processes, but also the application of specific knowledge to solve problematic management tasks.
The concept of “change” has been reflected as a process of transformation and as the transformation of an object into new legal forms through reorganization. The presented experience of managing American companies shows, first of all, the situation in which economic growth is carried out and all transformations are aimed at integration processes.
The analysis of modern experience of change management has been made in the context of crisis situations that require flexibility in managing all processes in the organization. The article presents a division of changes into groups, allowing you to identify areas that require timely management influence when developing an organization’s development program.
The analysis examines the most popular change management models and the actions of companies to manage changes during the coronavirus pandemic.
In conclusion, it has been concluded that for modern companies, change management requires not only constant analysis of internal organizational processes, but also the application of specific knowledge to solve problematic management tasks.
Keywords
adaptation,
business processes,
changes,
competition,
internal processes,
management,
reorganization,
transformation
F2
About the Authors
O. E. Astafeva
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor
99 Ryazanskii Prospect, 109542, Moscow, Russian Federation
I. L. Goncharov
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
99 Ryazanskii Prospect, 109542, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
99 Ryazanskii Prospect, 109542, Moscow, Russian Federation
N. A. Moiseenko
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor
99 Ryazanskii Prospect, 109542, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor
99 Ryazanskii Prospect, 109542, Moscow, Russian Federation
References
1. Astaf’eva O.E. (2017), «Managing organizational changes at enterprises in the context of environmental and economic strategy for sustainable development», Modern research in the main areas of humanities and natural sciences: Proceedings of the international scientific and theoretical conference “Modern research in the main areas of technical and social sciences”, Kazan, Russia, March 2–3, 2017, I.T. Nasretdinov (ed.), Pechat`- Servis-XXI vek, Kazan, Russia, pp. 85–87.
2. Eikhoff N. (2011), «Competition support policy or the “new” industrial policy», Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov, no. 3(69), pp. 5–11.
3. Druker P.F. (2004), Management tasks in the XXI century, per. Sangl, Izdatel‘stvo Vil‘yams, Moscow, Russia, 272 p.
4. Astaf’eva O.E. (2017), «Managing organizational changes at enterprises in the context of environmental and economic strategy for sustainable development», Modern research in the main areas of humanities and natural sciences: Proceedings of the international scientific and theoretical conference “Modern research in the main areas of technical and social sciences”, Kazan, Russia, March 2–3, 2017, I.T. Nasretdinov (ed.), Pechat`- Servis-XXI vek, Kazan, Russia, pp. 85–87.
5. Sharafutdinova N.N., Persteneva N.P. (2014), «Basic human resource management models», Vestnik molodykh uchenykh Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, no. 2 (30), pp. 228–233.
6. Druker P.F. (2004), Management tasks in the XXI century, per. Sangl, Izdatel‘stvo Vil‘yams, Moscow, Russia, 272 p.
7. Astaf’eva O.E., Potapova I.Y. (2016), «Features of formation and realization of resource saving measures complex aimed to solve social, ecological and economic problems of the Russian construction industry», International Review of Management and Marketing (IRMM), vol. 6, no. S1, pp. 13–19.
8. Sharafutdinova N.N., Persteneva N.P. (2014), «Basic human resource management models», Vestnik molodykh uchenykh Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, no. 2 (30), pp. 228–233.
9. Kozlovsky A.V., Astaf`eva O.E. (2020), «State support for investment policy in the real economy sector», Engineering Economics: Decisions and Solutions from Eurasian Perspective. Engineering Economics Week 2020, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 139, S. Ashmarina, V. Mantulenko, M. Vochozka (eds.), Springer, Cham, pp. 175–182.
10. Astaf’eva O.E., Potapova I.Y. (2016), «Features of formation and realization of resource saving measures complex aimed to solve social, ecological and economic problems of the Russian construction industry», International Review of Management and Marketing (IRMM), vol. 6, no. S1, pp. 13–19.
11. Lukmanova I., Kazanbieva A., Ershova N., Danilochkina N., Zubeeva E., Prokofiev D. (2018), “Criteria approach to assessing the business stability of industrial and energy enterprises”, E3S Web of Conferences: International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2018 “Business Technologies for Sustainable Urban Development”, St. Petersburg, Russia, December 10-12, vol. 110, O. Kalinina (ed.). Available at: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2019/36/e3sconf_spbwosce2019_02135/e3sconf_spbwosce2019_02135.html (accessed 21.06.2020).
12. Kozlovsky A.V., Astaf`eva O.E. (2020), «State support for investment policy in the real economy sector», Engineering Economics: Decisions and Solutions from Eurasian Perspective. Engineering Economics Week 2020, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 139, S. Ashmarina, V. Mantulenko, M. Vochozka (eds.), Springer, Cham, pp. 175–182.
13. Fleischer G., Bensoussan B. (2007), Business and competitive analysis: effective application of new and classic methods, FT Press, Moscow, Russia, 590 p.
14. Lukmanova I., Kazanbieva A., Ershova N., Danilochkina N., Zubeeva E., Prokofiev D. (2018), “Criteria approach to assessing the business stability of industrial and energy enterprises”, E3S Web of Conferences: International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2018 “Business Technologies for Sustainable Urban Development”, St. Petersburg, Russia, December 10-12, vol. 110, O. Kalinina (ed.). Available at: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2019/36/e3sconf_spbwosce2019_02135/e3sconf_spbwosce2019_02135.html (accessed 21.06.2020).
15. Germaschewski Y. (2020), “Stabilization policy, infrastructure investment, and welfare in a small open economy”, Economic Modelling, Forthcoming, no. 84, pp. 322–339. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3280694
16. Fleischer G., Bensoussan B. (2007), Business and competitive analysis: effective application of new and classic methods, FT Press, Moscow, Russia, 590 p.
17. Landesmann M.A., Stöllinger R. (2019), “Structural change, trade and global production networks: an ‘appropriate industrial policy’ for peripheral and catching-up economies”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 48 (C), pp. 7–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.04.001
18. Germaschewski Y. (2020), “Stabilization policy, infrastructure investment, and welfare in a small open economy”, Economic Modelling, Forthcoming, no. 84, pp. 322–339. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3280694
19. Yakovlev G.I., Streltsov A.V. «Formation of industrial policy under uncertainty growth», Engineering Economics: Decisions and Solutions from Eurasian Perspective, Engineering Economics Week 2020, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 139, S. Ashmarina, V. Mantulenko, M. Vochozka (eds), Cham, Springer, 2020, pp. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53277-2_2
20. Landesmann M.A., Stöllinger R. (2019), “Structural change, trade and global production networks: an ‘appropriate industrial policy’ for peripheral and catching-up economies”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 48 (C), pp. 7–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.04.001
21. Yakovlev G.I., Streltsov A.V. «Formation of industrial policy under uncertainty growth», Engineering Economics: Decisions and Solutions from Eurasian Perspective, Engineering Economics Week 2020, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 139, S. Ashmarina, V. Mantulenko, M. Vochozka (eds), Cham, Springer, 2020, pp. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53277-2_2
Review
For citations:
Astafeva O.E., Goncharov I.L., Moiseenko N.A. Analysis of change management experience in organizations. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2020;8(3):24-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-8-3-24-32
Views:
1070
Email this article 