Experience in implementing the European Union’s regional investment policy to attract foreign direct investments
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-2-39-48
Abstract
The article reviews the investment policy of the Eurozone regions in relation to foreign direct investments (hereinafter-FDI). A quantitative assessment of FDI in the global aspect and at the level of the European Union has been given. It has been determined that both global FDI flows and at the level of the EU economy decreased at the end of 2018. The rating of the Eurozone countries by the level of FDI for 2018, the leaders of which are Germany, Ireland and France, is given. The FDI market by type of economic activity has been analysed. It has been revealed that a large share of the market is made up of sales and marketing (up to 40%) and production sector (up to 30%). In more detail the trends in the investment policy of those countries that recorded a sharp growth or a sharp decline in FDI have been highlighted, namely, France, Germany, Spain, Belgium, Poland and Ireland. The main factors that negatively affect the investment situation in the European Union have been emphasized, including: General political instability, threats of global protectionism, high levels of public debt in a number of countries, fiscal reform and US economic policy, and others.
At the end, taking into account the current problems in the EU, recommendations have been formulated to activate the investment policy in the field of FDI at the level of this regional Association, aimed at promoting its socio-economic development. The main focus of investment policy development in the EU countries should be on aspects that promote macroeconomic and political stability, create a favorable business environment and create a reliable legal framework. In addition, it is extremely important to carry out structural reforms in the financial sector: to reduce the budget deficit and public debt in a number of countries. In conclusion, it is emphasized that by implementing an investment policy in accordance with the current needs of the Eurozone economy, it is possible to reduce the gap in the development of European regions and create an integrative and stronger economic Union.
About the Authors
L. S. NevyantsevaRussian Federation
Nevyantseva Liliya - Postgraduate student
N. Yu. Vlasova
Russian Federation
Vlasova Natalia - Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor
References
1. Adamanova Z. O. Investitsionnye protsessy v ES: postkriz-isnye tendentsii i novaya politika stimulirovaniya [Investment processes in the EU: post- crisis trends and new stimulus policies], Nauchnyi vestnik Odesskogo natsiona’lnogo ekonom-icheskogo universiteta [Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University], 2014, no. 3 (211), pp. 5—15.
2. Belyaev D. V. Tendentsii razvitiya pryamykh inostrannykh investitsii v usloviyakh globalizatsii [ Trends in the development of foreign direct investment in the context of globalization], Molodoi uchenyi, 2013, no. 5, pp. 253—263.
3. Kochemasova A. V. Mirovoi opyt privlecheniya pryamykh inostrannykh investitsii v usloviyakh globalizatsii ekonomiki [World experience in attracting foreign direct investment in a globalized economy], Finansy i kredit [Finance and Credit], 2013, no. 18 (546), pp. 66—77.
4. Murtuzalieva S. Yu. Evropeiskii opyt regional>noi politiki [European experience in regional policy], Nauka — promyshlennosti i servisu, 2010, no. 5-1, pp. 225—229.
5. Rossiya v mezhdunarodnom dvizhenii kapitala v 2018 — nachale 2019 goda: analiticheskii doklad [Russia in international capital flows in 2018-early 2019: analytical report], A. S. Bulatov. Yu. D. Kvashnin, A. V. Kuznetsov, et al, Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi institut mezhdunarodnykh ot-noshenii (universitet)Ministerstva inostrannykh del Rossi-iskoi Federatsii, laboratoriyame zhdunarodnogo dvizheniya kapitala [Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Laboratory of International Capital Movement], Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet, 2019, 59 p.
6. Tyurina O. A. Politika Frantsii v oblasti pryamykh inostrannykh investitsii v usloviyakh mirovogo finansovogo krizisa i krizisa zony evro [France’s foreign direct investment policy in the context of the global financial crisis and the Euro zone crisis], Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Science of the Person: Humanitarian Researches], 2015, no. 2 (20), pp. 224—230.
7. V 2018 godu pryamye inostrannye investitsii v mire snizilis’ na 27% [In 2018, foreign direct investments in the world decreased by 27%]. Available at: https://ru.investing.com/news/economy/article-613887 (accessed 18.04.2020).
8. Globalnyi reiting stran i territorii mira p o urovnyu pryamykh inostrannykh investitsii [Global ranking of countries and territories of the world by the level offoreign direct investments]. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/research/foreign-di-rect-investment-index/info (accessed 18.04.2020).
9. Evrokomissiya nazvala i proanalizirovala glavnye ekonom-icheskie vyzovy ES [The European Commission named and analyzed the main economic challenges of the EU]. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/21/11/2018/5bf-533da9a7947812bab8e97 (accessed 20.04.2020).
10. Issledovanie investitsionnoi privlekatel’nosti stran Evropy [Research of investment attractiveness of European countries]. Available at: https://www.ey.com.br/Publication/vwLUAs-sets/ey-european-attractiveness-survey-2019-rus/$FILE/ey-european-attractiveness-survey-2019rus.pdf (accessed 18.04.2020) .
11. Obzor mirovoi ekonomiki — iyul’ 2019 goda [World economy overview-July 2019]. Available at: http://www.ereport.ru/reviews/rev201907.htm (accessed 18.04.2020).
12. Ekonomika Evrosoyuza v 2019 godu: ostanetsya li “obshchii dom” na plavu? [EU economy in 2019: will the “common house”remain afloat?]. Available at: https://eurasia.expert/ekonomika-evrosoyuza-v-2019-godu/ (accessed 18.04.2020).
Review
For citations:
Nevyantseva L.S., Vlasova N.Yu. Experience in implementing the European Union’s regional investment policy to attract foreign direct investments. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2020;8(2):39-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-2-39-48