Spatial changes management in order to ensure economic security

The issues of spatial changes in the context of measures to ensure the economic security of territories (regions, municipalities) have been considered. The key factors of spatial polarization, regional and intraregional socio-economic differentiation in the Russian Federation have been noted. The causes of sparseness and fragmentation of the economic space of the Russian Federation have been revealed. As shown by the study, the theory of spatial changes is only being formed as a separate direction of the spatial economy. A review of foreign and domestic literature in the field of spatial changes made it possible to identify their main characteristics, in particular, orientation towards sustainable development, transformation of cities and the formation of agglomerations, the development of the urban environment, spatial compression and expansion of territories, the formation of innovative opportunities for spatial changes.

A comparative analysis of the traditional and growth-oriented entrepreneurial policy allowed us to reveal the differences, disadvantages and advantages of the transition to a model of entrepreneurial economy in the regions. The comparison was carried out according to such parameters as: the key task, emphasis, the goal of entrepreneurial policy, forms of support, sources of financing, protection of intellectual property and personalization of business, institutional measures.

The expediency of applying the approaches of spatial changes and spatial innovation-entrepreneurial ecosystems to increase the competitiveness of territories and ensure economic security at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation has been empirically substantiated. The peculiarity of the innovation-entrepreneurial ecosystems approach is that it emphasizes the context of productive (resultant) entrepreneurship.

In conclusion, conclusions have been formulated, in particular, about the need for phased spatial changes (design and transformation stages), taking into account the peculiarities of the implementation of the spatial transformation mechanism at each stage.

1. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 16.01.2017 № 13 “Ob utverzhdenii Osnov gosudarstvennoi politiki regional’nogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2025 goda” [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On Approval of the Fundamentals of the State Policy of Regional Development of the Russian Federation for the Period until 2025No. 13, dated on January 16, 2017], legal reference system "Сonsultant plus”. Available at:http://www.consult-ant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_210967/ (accessed 23.12.2019).

2. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 13.02.2019 № 207-r “Ob utverzhdenii Strategii prostran-stvennogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii do 2025 goda [Order of the Government of the Russian Federation “On Approval of the Strategy for Spatial Development of the Russian Federation until 2025 № 207-r dated on February 13, 2019], legal reference system ”Сonsultant plus”. Available at:http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_318094/ (accessed 23.12.2019).

3. Antonova A. A., Grinchel’ B. M. Aglomeratsionnost’ kak faktor ekonomicheskoii innovatsionnoi konkurentosposob-nosti [Agglomeration as a factor of economic and innovative competitiveness], Prostranstvennye faktory innovatsionnoi modernizatsii ekonomiki: materialy Vserossiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 2526 iyunya 2013 g. [Spatial factors of innovative modernization of the economy: proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Saint-Petersburg. June 25-26, 2013], St-Petersburg, SPbGUAP, 2013, pp. 129-133.

4. Bukhval’d E. M. Rossiiskii federalizm na kriticheskom rubezhe razvitiya [Russian federalism at a critical development milestone], Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2008, no. 9, pp. 70-83.

5. Vishnyakov Ya. D., Kiseleva S. P. Natsional’naya ideologiya i ekologo-orientirovannoe tekhnologicheskoe razvitie Rossii v XXI veke [National ideology and environmental-ori-ented technological development of Russia in the twenty-first century], Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii [Ecology and Industry of Russia], 2016, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 53-56.

6. Dvizhenie regionov Rossii k innovatsionnoi ekonomike [ The movement of Russian regions to an innovative economy], pod red. A. G. Granberga, S. D. Valenteya; In-t ekonomiki RAN, Moscow, Nauka, 2006,402 p.

7. Kiseleva N. N., Markvart E., Starodubrovskaya I. V. Up-ravlenie prostranstvennymi izmeneniyami na regional’nom i munitsipal’nom urovnyakh [Spatial change management at the regional and municipal levels], Moscow, Delo, RANKhiGS, 2018, 282 p.

8. Kiseleva S. P. Ponyatiinye i organizatsionnye osnovy mekhanizma ekologo-orientirovannogo tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya [Conceptual and organizationalfoundations of the mechanism of ecologically oriented technological development], Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta, 2017, no. 4 (16), pp. 82-87.

9. Kozhevina O. V. Teoriya upravleniya (v ponyatiyakh i kat-egoriyakh) [Management theory (in terms and categories)], Barnaul, AltGU, 2008, 171 p.

10. Kozhevina O. V. Opredelenie neravnovesnosti razvitiya ekonomiki APK na mezhregional’nom urovne [Determining the disequilibrium of the development of the agro-industrial complex economy at the interregional level], Barnaul, Azbuka, 200 4, 151 p.

11. Kundius V. A. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ sel’skogo khozyaistva v Nemetskom natsional’nom raione [Economic effectiveness of agriculture in the German national region], Barnaul, AltGU, 2003, 299 p.

12. Metelev S. E. Prostranstvennye izmeneniya rossiiskoi ekonomiki i immigratsionnaya politika [Spatial changes in the Russian economy and immigration policy], Omskii nauchnyi vestnik [OmskScientific Bulletin], 2006, no. 6, pp. 148-153.

13. Mirokhina A. A. Tipy reaktsii sistemy regional'nogo upravleniya na izmenenie sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh i pros-transtvennykh parametrov razvitiya territorii [Types of reac-

14. tions of a regional management system to changes in socio-economic and spatial parameters of territorial development], Evolyutsiya sovremennoi nauki: sbornik statei mezhdunarod-noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Ufa, 18 fev. 2017 g. [Evolution of modern science:collection of articles of the international scientific-practical conference. Ufa, February 18, 2017], Ufa, Omega-Sains, 2017, pp. 95—98.

15. Murava—Sereda A. V., Kiseleva S. P. Ustoichivost’ trans-granichnykh integratsionnykh protsessov innovatsionnogo razvitiya sotsio-ekologo-orientirovannogo tekhnologiches-kogo razvitiya [Sustainability of cross-border integrationpro-cesses of innovative development of socio-environmental-ori-ented technological development], Problemy mashinos-troeniya i avtomatizatsii [Engineering and Automation Problems], 2018, no. 2,pp. 144—153.

16. Stepanova S. V., Tolstoguzov O. V. Transformatsiya region-al’noi sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi sistemy: kontseptual’naya model’ [ Transformation of a regional socio-economic system: a conceptual model], Trudy Karel'skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2013, no. 5, pp. 12—21.

17. Suspitsyn S. A. Kontseptsiya i metodologiya izmereniya ustoichivykh prostranstvennykh transformatsii ekonomiki Rossii [ The concept and methodology of measuring sustainable spatial transformations of the Russian Economy], Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology], 2009, no. 3, pp. 179—182.

18. Dierwechter Y. Urban growth management and its discontents: Promises, practices, and geopolitics in US city-regions, New York: Palgrave, 2008, 289 p.

19. Carayannis E. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, New York, Springer Reference, 2013, 1941 p.

20. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Ear-ly-Stage Company Growth Dynamics. January 2014, Geneva, World Economic Forum, 2014. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/entrepreneurial-ecosys-tems-around-the-globe-and-early-stage-company-growth-dynamics/wp-content/blogs.dir/3 4/mp/files/pages/files/entrship-report14-170214-opt.pdf (accessed 23.12.2019).

21. Lonsdale J. Entrepreneurship: an International Introduc-tion,The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2013, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 130.

22. Mian S., Fayonlle A., Lamine W. Building sustainable regional platforms for incubating science and technology businesses, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2012, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 235—247.

23. Nambisan S, Baron R. Entrepreneurship in Innovation Ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ Seif-Regulatory Processes and Their Implications for New Venture Success, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2013, Vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1071—1097.

24. Mason C., Brown R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship, OECD. Available at:https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/entrepreneurial-ecosys-tems.pdf (accessed 23.12.2019).

25. Piro R., Ganser R. Parallel patterns of shrinking cities and urban growth: Spatial planning for sustainable development of city regions and rural areas, London, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2016, 283 p.

26. Stam E. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique, Journal European Planning Studies, 2015, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1759—1769.