Comparative analysis of organizationalculture transformation models
https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-1-94-101
Abstract
An analysis of organizational culture transformation models has been presented. The mechanisms and tools which can be used for changes, have been studied, which are understood as any actions aimed at reviving or reorienting the activity of the organization. Cultural changes in the form of a matrix, containing the effects of reactive and proactive factors and ameliorative and strategic goals, have been analysed.
Correlations between the stage of development of organizational culture and its transformation have been highlighted. Depending on the stage reached by the organization, specific sets of measures specific sets of measures are being taken. The key elements that can ensure the success of organizational and cultural changes, such as leadership, staff involvement, stakeholder participation, communication changes, emotion management, etc., have been considered. Four main sources of change have been determined, three of which are relatively independent of management actions, and the fourth is directly related to management actions: survival, evolutionary, revolutionary processes, and managed changes. In the process of cultural change, three main stages in the life of an organization have been emphasized: the foundation and early growth, development, maturity and decline, and the corresponding mechanisms and tools of organizational culture, which can be used for change. In particular, the following have been reviewed in detail: gradual change; changing organizational “therapy”; developing elements of mixed culture; selectively promoting subcultures; planning for project development and creating a structure for the organization; defrosting and changing through new technologies; changing by infusing personnel from outside the organization; defrosting conflicts and challenging myths; basic remodeling of the organization; change by compulsion.
The limitations that arise in the process of organizational culture transformation have been analysed. It has been concluded that regardless of which model will be adopted as the basis for the process of changing the organizational culture, the context in which the transformations take place should be taken into account. The enabling conditions, facilitating transformation and the reactive factors, that will resist it, should be understood and analysed by decision-makers.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. V. GroshevRussian Federation
Groshev Igor - Doctor of Economic Sciences, Doctor of Psychological, Deputy Director.
Moscow
Menin He
Russian Federation
He Menin - Postgraduate student.
KurskReferences
1. Groshev I. V., Krasnoslobodtsev A. A. Organizatsionnaya kultura: uchebnik s grifom ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial-nosti “Menedzhment” po ekonomicheskim specialnostyam [ Organizational culture: a textbook with the stamp of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation for University students studying in the specialty “Management”, in economic specialties], 2-e izd, pererab. i dop, Moscow, Unity-Dana, 2013, 535 p.
2. Groshev I. V., Krasnoslobodtsev A. A. Resursnyi potentsial organizatsionnoi kultury [Resource potential of organizational culture], Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 2015, no. 11-12, pp. 100-116.
3. Curran C. J. Organizational culture: the path to better organizations, Journal for Nonprofit Management, 2005, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 123-142.
4. Kotter J. Leading change, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press, 1996, 378 p.
5. O’Donnell O., Boyle R. Understanding and managing organizational culture, CPMR Discussion Paper, 2008, no. 40, pp. 156-173.
6. Schein E.H. Organizational culture and leadership, 3rd Edition, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2004, 426 p.
7. Young C. Organization culture change: the bottom line of diversity, The Diversity Factor, 2007, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 67-93.
Review
For citations:
Groshev I.V., He M. Comparative analysis of organizationalculture transformation models. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2020;8(1):94-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-1-94-101