Strategic and statistical analysis of regional socio-economic development in the conditions of the digital environment

Тhe creation and development of the digital economy in the regions of Russia is a new factor in their socio-economic development. This should be reflected in near future in the strategies of socio-economic development of regions. In the Russian Federation, at present, for developing and evaluating the implementation of the socio-economic development strategy of the region, a universal methodology has not been developed, and the standard approaches for implementing strategic planning have been adapted from the management of corporate structures.

The purpose of the article is to test the methodology of statistical evaluation of the socio-economic development of the region in the digital environment. The methodological basis of the study are: the general statistical method of dynamic standards, index and coefficient analysis, the method of pairwise comparisons. The scientific novelty of the presented results are the author’s methodological developments: the system of indicators of the socio-economic development of the region in the digital environment and the regulatory assessment model. The practical significance of the research results lies in the possibility of applying the author’s assessment methodology for monitoring regional development strategies.

The creation of integral statistical measures (models) for monitoring traditional and new factors of the region’s development will provide solutions to their quantitative assessment, allow clarify both the planning and implementation stages of the region’s shortcomings and problems, ensure the implementation of the principle of integrated socioeconomic development of the region, contribute to enhancing the consistency of the objectives of regional development strategies, it will allow diagnostics of the development of the digital economy and develop new strategic orientations at the regional level, which in turn will make it possible to develop organizational mechanisms for involving people in the region in resolving issues of territorial strategic development.

1. Ukaz Prezedenta RF ot 11.11.2017 g. № 548 “Ob otsenke effektivnosti deyatel’nosti organov ispolnitel’noi vlasti sub’ektov RF” [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of November 11, 2017. No. 548 “About the evaluation of the effectiveness of the executive authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation”]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/ free_doc/new_site/rosstat/pok-monitor/pok-monitor.html (accessed 29.07.2019).

2. Programma “Tsifrovaya ekonomika Rossiiskoi Federatsii”. Utverzdena raspor’iazheniem Pravitel’stva RF 28 July, 2017, No. 1632-r. [Program “Digital economy of the Russian Federation”. Approved by the decree of the RF Government 28.07.2017, No. 1632-r]. Available at: http://static.government.ru/media/ (accessed 29.07.2019).

3. Burtseva T. A. Indikativnaya model’ monitoringa investitsionnoi privlekatel’nosti regiona [Indicative model of monitoring the investment attractiveness of the region], Voprosy statistiki [Statistical Issues], 2009, no. 6, pp. 37–45.

4. Kaplan D., Norton R. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelei: Ot strategii k deistvi’yu. [Balanced scorecard: from strategy to action], Moscow, Olimp-Biznes, 2006, 294 p.

5. Pogostinskaya N. N., Pogostinskii Yu. A., Vlasova M. S. Izmerenie strategii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitia Arkticheskoi zony Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Measuring the Strategy for socio-economic development of the Russian Arctic zone], Arktika: Ekologia i Ekonomika, 2019, No. 1 (33), рр. 21–33.

6. Pogostinskii Y. A. Normativnye modeli sistemnogo analiza khozyaistvennoi deyatel’nosti predpryatiya: Monografiya [Normative models of system analysis of economic activity of the enterprise: Monograph], Sanct-Petersburg, SPbUEF, 1999, 74 p.

7. Svetunkov S. G., Zagranovskaya A. V., Svetunkov I. S. Kompleksnoznachnye analiz i modelirovanie neravnomernosti sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii: Monografia [Complex analysis and modeling of the uneven social and economic development of the regions of Russia: Monograph.]. Available at: http://sergey.svetunkov.ru/economics/complex/MD2012 (accessed 29.04.2019).

8. Lyons B., Gumbus A., Bellhouse D. E. Aligning capital investment decisions with the balanced scorecard, Journal of Cost Management, 2003, March/April, pp. 34–38.

9. Martinsons M., Davison R., Tse D. The balanced scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems, 1999, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 71–88.

10. Norreklit H. The balanced scorecard: What is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the balanced scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2003, no. 28 (6), pp. 591–619.

11. Paladino B. 5 key principles of corporate performance management: How do Balanced Scorecard Hall of Fame, Malcolm Baldrige, Sterling, Fortune 100, APQC, and Forbes award winners drive value? Strategic Finance, 2007, June, pp. 39–45.

12. Schonberger R. J. Lean performance management (Metrics don't add up). Cost Management, 2008, January/February, pp. 5–10.