manguuУправлениеUPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)2309-36332713-1645State University of Management10.12737/24701manguu-74Research ArticleГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕPUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONНаправления институциональной трансформации государственной службыDirections of Civil Service Institutional TransformationБорщевскийГ. А.BorshevskiyG. A.

канд. ист. наук, доцент 

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Service and Personnel Policy

ga.borshchevskiy@migsu.ranepa.ruИнститут государственной службы и управления Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы (РАНХиГС) при Президенте РФРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationRussian Federation201730032017014154Copyright © Борщевский Г.А., 20172017Борщевский Г.А.Borshevskiy G.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/74

В современных условиях сложились предпосылки для реального участия граждан в управлении переход к сетевой организации, партнерству, производству общественных благ, ценностям общественного служения. Доказано, что в Концепции реформирования системы государственной службы РФ (2001 г.) заложен модернизационный потенциал для построения открытой и демократичной государственной службы. Предложена классификация барьеров и вызовов, препятствующих реформированию государственной службы, сформулированы точки роста и альтернативные векторы трансформации. Рассмотрены риски каждой альтернативы в кратко-, средне- и долгосрочной перспективе и способы их преодоления. Указано, что приоритетом должна стать гармонизация правовых основ государственной службы и бюджетного сектора. На первом этапе предлагается отказ от понимания государственной службы как специфической «служебной» деятельности и сближение ее правового содержания с иными видами деятельности в бюджетной сфере. Отказ от упоминания об обслуживающем характере в деятельности государственных служащих направлен на повышение их личной ответственности. Следует дополнить законодательство базовым принципом ориентации государственных служащих в их деятельности на обеспечение экономического роста и повышение качества жизни граждан РФ. На следующем этапе может быть сформирован новый вид службы – публичная служба – включающий в себя государственную гражданскую службу, муниципальную службу и работу в организациях бюджетной сферы, а также в отдельных организациях иных типов. Это предполагает изменение контуров кадровой политики: формирование единого кадрового резерва для всей публичной службы, совершенствование квалификационных требований к должностям с учетом профессиональных специализаций, обеспечение действенного общественного контроля. Системный подход к созданию публичной службы позволит повысить эффективность государственных институтов и их устойчивость перед лицом глобальной нестабильности.

The concepts of rational bureaucracy, New Public Management and Good Governance were studied. It is indicated that wrongly assume that one of them is more progressive, because all concepts originally aimed at the rationalization of the public service and subordination its own interests according the interests of society. A set of conditions for the participation of citizens in governance exists today. There are a networked organization, a partnership, a production of public goods, and value of public interest. It is proved that in the Concept of the Russian Federation civil service reform (2001) laid the modernization potential for building an open and democratic public service. We postulate the classification of the barriers and challenges that hinder the civil service reform, and we formulate the growth points and the alternative transformation vectors. Then we consider the risks of each alternative in the short, medium and long term, and how to overcome them. It is indicated that the priority should be the harmonization of the legal framework for civil service and public sector. In the first step is need the convergence of the legal content of civil service with other activities in the public sector, and the renouncement the civil servants to serve to politicians, which is aimed at increasing their personal responsibility. It is necessary to implement the new basic legal principle of targeting efforts of the civil servants to achieve economic growth and improve the quality of citizens life. In the next step a new phenomenon – the public service – should be formed. The new public service will include the civil service, municipal service and the public sector organizations, as well as some other types of organizations. This requires some changes in the personnel policy: the formation of a single personnel reserve for the entire public service, improving the qualification requirements for all public positions based on professional specializations, and ensuring the effective public control. A systematic approach to the creation of the public service will increase the efficiency of public institutions and their resilience in the face of global instability. Our conclusions were tested in draft the Strategy of socio-economic development of Russia for the period till 2030.

публичная службагосударственная службатрансформацияреформаобщественный институтгражданское обществогосударственно-общественное управлениеcivil servicepublic servicetransformationreformpublic institutionscivil societyGovernanceReferencesМагомедов К.О. Социологический мониторинг кадровой коррупции в системе государственного и муниципального управления [Teкст] / К.О. Магомедов // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. – 2016. – № 2. – С. 213–215.Magomedov K.O. Sotsiologicheskiy monitoring kadrovoy korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Sociological monitoring of personnel corruption in the state and municipal management system]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and social changes]. 2016, I. 2, pp. 213–215.Vries M. de, Nemec J. Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths // The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2013. Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 4–16.Vries M. de, Nemec J. Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths // The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2013, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 4–16.Sager F., Rosser C. Weber, Wilson, and Hegel. Theories of Modern Bureaucracy // Public Administration Review, 2009. Vol. 69, No 6, pp. 1136–1147.Sager F., Rosser C. Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of Modern Bureaucracy // Public Administration Review, 2009, Vol. 69, No 6, pp. 1136–1147.Вебер М. Политические работы (1895–1919) [Teкст] / М. Вебер. – М.: Праксис, 2003. – 424 с. 5. Вильсон В. Государство. Прошлое и настоящее конституционных учреждений [Teкст] / В. Вильсон. – М.: Изд. Сытина, 1905. – 346 с.Veber M. Politicheskie raboty (1895-1919) [Political work (1895-1919)]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2003. 424 p.Tullock G. The Politics of Bureaucracy. New York: Public Affairs Press, 1965. 346 p.Vil’son V. Gosudarstvo. Proshloe i nastoyashchee konstitutsionnykh uchrezhdeniy [State. Past and present of the constitutional institutions]. Moscow, Sytina Publ., 1905. 346 p.Dunleavy P., Hood C. From Old Public-Administration to New Public Management // Public Money & Management, 1994. Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp. 9–16.Tullock G. The Politics of Bureaucracy. New York: Public Affairs Press, 1965. 346 p.Niskanen W.A. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996. 128 p.Dunleavy P., Hood C. From Old Public-Administration to New Public Management // Public Money & Management, 1994, Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp. 9–16.Olsen J.P. Governing through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 224 p.Niskanen W.A. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996. 128 p.Drechsler W. The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management // Post-autistic economics review. 2005. Issue 33, рр. 17–28.Olsen J.P. Governing through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 224 p.Peters G.B. The future of governing. 2nd ed. Lawrence: University Press of Kanzas, 2001. 320 p.Drechsler W. The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management // Post-autistic economics review. 2005. Issue 33. rr. 17–28.Goldfinch S., Walli, J. Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform // Public Administration, 2010. Vol. 88, Issue 4, рр. 1099–1115.Peters G.B. The future of governing. 2nd ed. Lawrence: University Press of Kanzas, 2001. 320 p.Rawls J.A. Theory of Justice. Cambridge: University Press, 1971. 140 p.Goldfinch S., Walli, J. Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform // Public Administration, 2010, Vol. 88, Issue 4, rr. 1099-1115.Greve B. Welfare and Welfare State: Present and Future. London: Routledge, 2014. 234 p.Rawls J.A. Theory of Justice. Cambridge: University Press, 1971. 140 p.Heritier P., Silvestri P. (Eds.) Good government, Governance, Human complexity. Luigi Einaudi’s legacy and contemporary societies. Firenze, 2012. 340 p.Greve B. Welfare and Welfare State: Present and Future. London: Routledge, 2014. 234 p.Provan K.G., Keni, P. Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008, Issue 2, pp. 215–229.Heritier P., Silvestri P. (Eds.) Good government, Governance, Human complexity. Luigi Einaudi’s legacy and contemporary societies. Firenze, 2012. 340 p.Osborne S., Radnor Z., Strokosch K. Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? // Public Management Review, 2016. Vol. 18, Issue 5, pp. 639–653.Provan K.G., Keni, P. Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008, Issue 2, pp. 215-229.Van Eijk C., Steen T. Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence // International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2016. Vol. 82, Issue 1, pp. 28–46.Osborne S., Radnor Z., Strokosch K. Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? // Public Management Review, 2016, Vol. 18, Issue 5, pp. 639–653.Van De Walle S., Steijn B., Jilke S. Extrinsic motivation, PSM and labor market characteristics: a multilevel model of public sector employment preference in 26 countries // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2015. Vol. 81. No. 4, pp. 833–855.Van Eijk C., Steen T. Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence // International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2016, Vol. 82, Issue 1, pp. 28–46.Denhardt R.B., Denhardt J.V. The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering // Public Administration Review, 2000, Vol. 60, Issue 6, рр. 549–559.Van De Walle S., Steijn B., Jilke S. Extrinsic motivation, PSM and labor market characteristics: a multilevel model of public sector employment preference in 26 countries // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2015. Vol. 81. No. 4. pp. 833–855.Denhardt J.V., Denhardt R.B. The New Public Service Revisited // Public Administration Review, 2015, Vol. 75, Issue 5, рр. 664–672.Denhardt R.B., Denhardt J.V. The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering // Public Administration Review, 2000, Vol. 60, Issue 6, rr. 549-559.Junjan V. PAR in Academic and Professional Literature: A Comparison of the Recent EU Accession Waves. In: Europeization in Public Administration Reforms. Ed. вy J. Nemec. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 2016. 458 p.Denhardt J.V., Denhardt R.B. The New Public Service Revisited // Public Administration Review, 2015, Vol. 75, Issue 5, rr. 664–672.Hardiman N., Scott C. Governance as Polity: An Institutional Approach to the Evolution of State Functions in Ireland // Public Administration, 2010, Vol. 88, Issue 1, pp. 170–189.Junjan V. PAR in Academic and Professional Literature: A Comparison of the Recent EU Accession Waves. In: Europeization in Public Administration Reforms. Ed. vy J. Nemec. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 2016. 458 p.Оболонский А.В. Кризис эффективности административно-бюрократического государства и поиски выхода [Teкст] / А.В. Оболонский // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 145–171.Hardiman N., Scott C. Governance as Polity: An Institutional Approach to the Evolution of State Functions in Ireland // Public Administration, 2010, Vol. 88, Issue 1, pp. 170-189.Shultz D. The Idea of the “State” in Contemporary Public Administration Theory // Вестник РУДН. – 2014. – № 1. – C. 90–102.Obolonskiy A.V. Krizis effektivnosti administrativnobyurokraticheskogo gosudarstva i poiski vykhoda [The crisis of the effectiveness of administrative and bureaucratic state and the search for yield]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Questions of state and municipal government]. 2014, I. 2, pp. 145–171.Барабашев А.Г. Кризис государственного управления и его влияние на основные административные парадигмы государства и бюрократии [Teкст] / А.Г. Барабашев // Вопросы государственного муниципального управления. – 2016. – № 3. – С. 163–194.Shultz D. The Idea of the “State” in Contemporary Public Administration Theory [Administration Theory]. Vestnik RUDN [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University]. 2014, I. 1, pp. 90–102.Барабашев А.Г. Теоретические ориентиры дальнейшего развития государственной службы Российской Федерации [Teкст] / А.Г. Барабашев // Вопросы государственного муниципального управления. – 2007. – № 1. – С. 19–52.Barabashev A.G. Krizis gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i ego vliyanie na osnovnye administrativnye paradigmy gosudarstva i byurokratii [The crisis of governance and its impact on the basic paradigm of the state administration and bureaucracy]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Questions of public municipal management]. 2016, I. 3, pp. 163–194.Адамович А. Реформирование системы государственной службы Российской Федерации [Teкст] / А. Адамович // Государственная служба. – 2014. – № 1. – С. 80–83.Barabashev A.G. Teoreticheskie orientiry dal’neyshego razvitiya gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Theoretical guidelines for the further development of the state service of the Russian Federation]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Questions of public municipal management]. 2007, I. 1, pp. 19–52.Adamovich A. Reformirovanie sistemy gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Reform of the Russian Federation civil service]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public service]. 2014, I. 1, pp. 80–83.Adamovich A. Reformirovanie sistemy gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Reform of the Russian Federation civil service]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public service]. 2014, I. 1, pp. 80–83.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.