manguuУправлениеUPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)2309-36332713-1645State University of Management10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-3-105-112manguu-540Research ArticleПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЙ ДИСКУРСPOLITICAL DISCOURSEЗаконодательство о прямой демократии в современном ВьетнамеLegislation on direct democracy in modern Vietnamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-1846ТхоаТ. Т.ThoaT. T.

Ты Тхи Тхоа, аспирант; зам. декана Факультета политической теории и профессиональной педагогики

109542, Рязанский пр-т, 99, г. Москва

639 Нгуен Трай, округ 11, район 5, г. Хошимин

Tu Thi Thoa, Postgraduate Student; Deputy Dean of the Political Theory and Professional Pedagogy Faculty

tuthoahvhc@gmail.comГосударственный университет управления; Университет физического воспитания и спортивного образования города ХошиминРоссияState University of Management; Ho Chi Minh City University of Physical Education and Sports EducationRussian Federation202220102022103105112Copyright © Тхоа Т.Т., 20222022Тхоа Т.Т.Thoa T.T.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/540

В последние годы прямой демократии уделяется все больше внимания, и она стала предметом многочисленных исследований в области политологии. Развитие прямой демократии рассматривается как средство укрепления современной демократии. Поэтому большинство демократических стран мира, включая Вьетнам, прилагают усилия для создания соответствующих механизмов для содействия позитивным последствиям этой формы демократии. Характеризуемый как развивающаяся страна с однопартийной правящей политической системой, Вьетнам стремится построить единое и сплоченное общество на основе обеспечения власти народа посредством прямой демократии и представительной демократии. С момента вступления в период обновления (с 1986 г.) прямая демократия вызывает во Вьетнаме все больший интерес, а система правовой базы для этой формы демократии все больше совершенствуется. Однако следует признать, что для страны, которая не имеет долгой истории внедрения демократии, особенно прямой демократии, вьетнамская правовая система, регулирующая эту сферу, все еще имеет много ограничений. В статье дается обзор существующей правовой системы прямой демократии во Вьетнаме, тем самым анализируется ряд ограничений и недостатков и предлагаются некоторые решения для преодоления этих проблем.

In recent years, direct democracy has received more and more attention and has become the subject of much research in the field of political science. The development of direct democracy is seen as a mean of consolidating modern democracy. Therefore, most democratic countries in the world have been making efforts to build appropriate mechanisms to promote the positive effects of this form of democracy, including Vietnam. Characterized as a developing country with a single-party ruling political system, Vietnam aims to build a united and cohesive society on the basis of ensuring the people’s mastery through direct and representative democracy. Since entering the period of renovation (since 1986), direct democracy has been of more interest in Vietnam along with the legal basis system for this form of democracy is increasingly improved. However, it must be acknowledged that, for a country that has not had a long history of implementing democracy, especially direct democracy, the Vietnamese legal system that regulates this field still has many limitations. The article gives an overview of the current legal system of direct democracy in Vietnam, thereby analyzing a number of limitations and shortcomings and orienting some solutions to overcome these problems.

демократияпрямая демократиязаконодательство о демократииобеспечение демократиипродвижение демократиивыборыреферендумыпрямая демократия во Вьетнамеdemocracydirect democracylegislation on democracyensuring democracypromoting democracyelectionsreferendumsdirect democracy in VietnamReferencesBowler S., Donovan T. (2004), “Measuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal”, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, no. 4(3), pp. 345–363, https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000400400305Bowler S., Donovan T. (2004), “Measuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal”, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, no. 4(3), pp. 345–363, https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000400400305Communist Party of Vietnam [Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam] (2005), The report summarizes a number of theoretical and practical issues through 20 years of renovation (1986-2006) [Báo cáo tổng kết một số vấn đề lý luận – thực tiễn qua 20 năm đổi mới(1986-2006)], National Truth Political Publishing House [Nhà xuất bản Chính trị Quốc gia sự thật], Ha Noi [Hà Nội], Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Communist Party of Vietnam [Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam] (2005), The report summarizes a number of theoretical and practical issues through 20 years of renovation (1986-2006) [Báo cáo tổng kết một số vấn đề lý luận – thực tiễn qua 20 năm đổi mới(1986-2006)], National Truth Political Publishing House [Nhà xuất bản Chính trị Quốc gia sự thật], Ha Noi [Hà Nội], Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Communist Party of Vietnam [Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam] (2016), Report summarizing some theoretical and practical issues over 30 years of renovation (1986-2016) [Báo cáo tổng kết một số vấn đề lý luận - thực tiễn qua 30 năm đổi mới (1986-2016)], National Truth Political Publishing House [Nhà xuất bản Chính trị Quốc gia sự thật], Ha Noi [Hà Nội], Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Communist Party of Vietnam [Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam] (2016), Report summarizing some theoretical and practical issues over 30 years of renovation (1986-2016) [Báo cáo tổng kết một số vấn đề lý luận - thực tiễn qua 30 năm đổi mới (1986-2016)], National Truth Political Publishing House [Nhà xuất bản Chính trị Quốc gia sự thật], Ha Noi [Hà Nội], Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Dvořák T., Zouhar J., Novák J. (2017), “The Effect of Direct Democracy on Turnout: Voter Mobilization or Participatory Momentum?”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 433–448, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1065912917698043Dvořák T., Zouhar J., Novák J. (2017), “The Effect of Direct Democracy on Turnout: Voter Mobilization or Participatory Momentum?”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 433–448, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1065912917698043Krämling A. Geißel B., Rinne J.R., Paulus L. (2022), “Direct democracy and equality: a global perspective”, International Political Science Review. February 2022, pp, 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F01925121211058660Krämling A. Geißel B., Rinne J.R., Paulus L. (2022), “Direct democracy and equality: a global perspective”, International Political Science Review. February 2022, pp, 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F01925121211058660Leemann L., Wasserfallen F. (2016), “The democratic effect of direct democracy”, American Political Science Review, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 750–762, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000307Leemann L., Wasserfallen F. (2016), “The democratic effect of direct democracy”, American Political Science Review, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 750–762, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000307Mai Hai Oanh [Mai Hải Oanh] (2020), “Promoting socialist democracy in Vietnam today” [Phát huy dân chủ xã hội chủ nghĩa ở Việt Nam hiện nay], Communist Journal [Tạp chí cộng sản], no. 8, pp. 8–12 (in Vietnamese). Nguyen Thi Dung [Nguyễn Thị Dung] (2018), “Direct Democracy – Conceptions and Methods of Implementation” [Dân chủ trực tiếp – quan niệm và phương thức thực hiện], Journal of Industry and Trade [Tạp chí Công thương], no. 3, pp. 22–26 (in Vietnamese).Mai Hai Oanh [Mai Hải Oanh] (2020), “Promoting socialist democracy in Vietnam today” [Phát huy dân chủ xã hội chủ nghĩa ở Việt Nam hiện nay], Communist Journal [Tạp chí cộng sản], no. 8, pp. 8–12 (in Vietnamese). Nguyen Thi Dung [Nguyễn Thị Dung] (2018), “Direct Democracy – Conceptions and Methods of Implementation” [Dân chủ trực tiếp – quan niệm và phương thức thực hiện], Journal of Industry and Trade [Tạp chí Công thương], no. 3, pp. 22–26 (in Vietnamese).Peters Y. (2016), “(Re-)Join the party! The effects of direct democracy on party membership in Europe”, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 138–159, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12120Peters Y. (2016), “(Re-)Join the party! The effects of direct democracy on party membership in Europe”, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 138–159, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12120Rudenko V.N (2003), Direct Democracy: Models of Government, Constitutional and Legal Institutions, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ. House, Yekaterinburg, Russia (in Russian).Rudenko V.N (2003), Direct Democracy: Models of Government, Constitutional and Legal Institutions, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ. House, Yekaterinburg, Russia (in Russian).Smith D.A., Tolbert C.J. (2007), “The instrumental and educative effects of ballot measures: Research on direct democracy in the American states”, State Politics and Policy Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 416–445, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F153244000700700404Smith D.A., Tolbert C.J. (2007), “The instrumental and educative effects of ballot measures: Research on direct democracy in the American states”, State Politics and Policy Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 416–445, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F153244000700700404Talpin J. (2018), “Do referendums make better citizens? The effects of direct democracy on political interest, civic competence and participation”, In: Morel L., Qvortrup M. (eds) The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy. Taylor & Francis, Oxon, New York, US.Talpin J. (2018), “Do referendums make better citizens? The effects of direct democracy on political interest, civic competence and participation”, In: Morel L., Qvortrup M. (eds) The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy. Taylor & Francis, Oxon, New York, US.Tolbert C.J., Smith D.A. (2005), “The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout”, American Politics Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 283–309, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04271904Tolbert C.J., Smith D.A. (2005), “The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout”, American Politics Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 283–309, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04271904

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.