manguuУправлениеUPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)2309-36332713-1645State University of Management10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-2-80-87manguu-510Research ArticleВЫЗОВЫ И УГРОЗЫTHREATS AND CHALLENGESПандемия COVID-19 как триггер цифровизации общества, государства и бизнесаCOVID-19 pandemic as a trigger for digitalization of the society, state and businesshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7029-0822КротенкоТ. Ю.KrotenkoT. Yu.

Кротенко Татьяна Юрьевна, канд. филос. наук, доц. каф. корпоративного управления

109542, Рязанский пр-т, 99, г. Москва

Tatyana Yu. Krotenko, Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof. at the Сorporate Governance Department

99, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109542

krotenkotatiana@rambler.ruГосударственный университет управленияРоссияState University of ManagementRussian Federation2022280620221028087Copyright © Кротенко Т.Ю., 20222022Кротенко Т.Ю.Krotenko T.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/510

Цель статьи – обозначить изменения, которые происходят с современной хозяйственной системой. В статье обсуждаются некоторые движущие силы и обстоятельства ее дефицитарного состояния. Пандемия коронавируса видится как «коллайдер», ускоритель перехода к новой модели мировой экономики. Ее базовые черты только намечаются, но уже заметно общее сознательное стремление к упорядочению и автоматизации многих процессов, разумной цифровизации общества, государства и бизнеса. Автор указывает на зачатки процессов трансформации в комплексе производительных сил и производственных отношений, заостряет особое внимание на тех качественных изменениях, к которым подтолкнула как сама пандемия, так и меры борьбы с ней. Эти результаты появились благодаря использованию следующих методов: а) анализ научных обзоров и статей, посвященных проблемам диагностики потребности и готовности к автоматизации общественных, государственных и организационных процессов; б) экспертный опрос, проведенный в онлайн-формате в период «осеннего карантина» 2021 г. – именно в это время существенно обострились проблемы адаптации к экстремальным изменениям, а также потребность в исследовании и практическом взгляде на вопросы интеллектуализации трансформационных процессов в обществе, государстве, бизнесе; в) контент-анализ ответов на открытые вопросы, предлагаемые респондентам. В заключении сделаны выводы о насущной потребности в создании полезных технологий, их грамотном внедрении в конкретных условиях и формировании доброжелательной регуляторной среды. Это важно не только с теоретической точки зрения, но и для практического сохранения темпов цифровой трансформации, устойчивого развития экономики, общественного блага.

The purpose of the article is to outline the changes that are taking place with the modern economic system. The article discusses some of the driving forces and circumstances of her deficient condition. The coronavirus pandemic is seen as a «collider», as an accelerator of the transition to a new model of the global economy. Its basic features are just being outlined, but a general conscious desire to streamline and automate many processes, to the reasonable digitalization of society, the state and business is already noticeable. The author points to the beginnings of transformation processes in the complex of productive forces and production relations, focuses special attention on those qualitative changes that were prompted by both the pandemic itself and the measures to combat it. These results appeared due to the use of the following methods: a) analysis of scientific reviews and articles devoted to the problems of diagnosing the need and readiness for automation of public, state and organizational processes; b) an expert survey conducted online during the «autumn quarantine» (2021), it was at this time that the problems of adapting to extreme changes, and the need for research and a practical look at the issues of intellectualization of transformational processes in society, state, and business, became significantly aggravated; c) content analysis of answers to open questions offered to respondents. The conclusions are drawn about the urgent need for the creation of useful technologies, their competent implementation in specific conditions and the formation of a benevolent regulatory environment. This is important not only from a theoretical point of view, but also for the practical preservation of the pace of digital transformation, sustainable economic development, and public good.

бизнесгосударствоизменениянаучно-технический прогрессобществообщественное благопреобразованияцифровая трансформацияцифровизацияэкономическая модельbusinessstatechangesscientific and technical progresssocietypublic goodtransformationsdigital transformationdigitalizationeconomic modelReferencesAntonov V.G., Kuptsova E.V. and Kuptsova E.S. (2021), “Changes in the organisation management system”, Upravlenie / Management (Russia), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 90–98. https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2021-9-3-90-98Antonov V.G., Kuptsova E.V. and Kuptsova E.S. (2021), “Changes in the organisation management system”, Upravlenie / Management (Russia), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 90–98. https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2021-9-3-90-98Bodrunov S.D. (2017), “Return of industrialization – return of Galbraith: from NIS.2 to noospheric civilization, Economic Revival of Russia = Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, no. 2 (52), pp. 17–21.Bodrunov S.D. (2017), “Return of industrialization – return of Galbraith: from NIS.2 to noospheric civilization, Economic Revival of Russia = Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, no. 2 (52), pp. 17–21.Glazyev S.Yu. (2020), “Noonomics as the core of the formation of a new technological and world economic order”, Economic revival of Russia = Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, no. 2 (64), pp. 15–32. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-15-32Glazyev S.Yu. (2020), “Noonomics as the core of the formation of a new technological and world economic order”, Economic revival of Russia = Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, no. 2 (64), pp. 15–32. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-15-32Guzev M.M. (2020), “Philosophical and economic lessons of the coronavirus COVID-19”, Philosophy of economy = Filosofiya khozyaistva, no. 4 (130), pp. 32–49.Guzev M.M. (2020), “Philosophical and economic lessons of the coronavirus COVID-19”, Philosophy of economy = Filosofiya khozyaistva, no. 4 (130), pp. 32–49.Dyatlov S.A. and Kudryavtseva K.V. (2020), “Digital goods in service and digital economy”, Innovation, no. 257 (3), pp. 2–7. https://doi.org/10.26310/2071-3010.2020.257.3.009Dyatlov S.A. and Kudryavtseva K.V. (2020), “Digital goods in service and digital economy”, Innovation, no. 257 (3), pp. 2–7. https://doi.org/10.26310/2071-3010.2020.257.3.009Lenchuk E.B. and Buzgalin A.V. (2020), “Global problems and chalenges condition the growth in the economic role of the state”, Questions of Political Economy = Voprosy politicheskoi ekonomii, no. 1, pp. 112–119.Lenchuk E.B. and Buzgalin A.V. (2020), “Global problems and chalenges condition the growth in the economic role of the state”, Questions of Political Economy = Voprosy politicheskoi ekonomii, no. 1, pp. 112–119.Nizhegorodtsev R.M. (2020), “Coronacrisis: the formation of a virus-digital economy”, Philosophy of economy = Filosofiya khozyaistva, no. 3, pp. 125–152.Nizhegorodtsev R.M. (2020), “Coronacrisis: the formation of a virus-digital economy”, Philosophy of economy = Filosofiya khozyaistva, no. 3, pp. 125–152.Orwell G. (2020), Diaries, Alpina non-fiction, Moscow. (In Russian).Orwell G. (2020), Diaries, Alpina non-fiction, Moscow. (In Russian).Osipov Y.M. (2020), “Under shock changes”, Philosophy of economy = Filosofiya khozyaistva, no. 2, pp. 259–267.Osipov Y.M. (2020), “Under shock changes”, Philosophy of economy = Filosofiya khozyaistva, no. 2, pp. 259–267.Ryazanov V.T. (2020), “New industrial-technotronic society: the future is in question”, Economic revival of Russia = Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, no. 2 (64), pp. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-93-103Ryazanov V.T. (2020), “New industrial-technotronic society: the future is in question”, Economic revival of Russia = Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, no. 2 (64), pp. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-93-103Sharipov F.F. (2021), “The current state and prospects of the nuclear power industry of China”, Vestnik universiteta, no. 10, pp. 104–108. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-10-104-108Sharipov F.F. (2021), “The current state and prospects of the nuclear power industry of China”, Vestnik universiteta, no. 10, pp. 104–108. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-10-104-108Schumpeter J. (2004), History of Economic Analysis, vol. 2, Economic School, St. Petersburg. (In Russian).Schumpeter J. (2004), History of Economic Analysis, vol. 2, Economic School, St. Petersburg. (In Russian).Voeikov M.I. (2019), “State, material production and the economy of the future”, Questions of Political Economy, no. 3, pp. 157–166.Voeikov M.I. (2019), “State, material production and the economy of the future”, Questions of Political Economy, no. 3, pp. 157–166.Wallerstein I. (2015), “Structural crisis, or why capitalists may find capitalism unprofitable”, In: Wallerstein I et al, Does capitalism have a future? Gaidar Institute Publ. House, Moscow, pp. 23–61.Wallerstein I. (2015), “Structural crisis, or why capitalists may find capitalism unprofitable”, In: Wallerstein I et al, Does capitalism have a future? Gaidar Institute Publ. House, Moscow, pp. 23–61.Weller S. (2005), The Bradbury chronicles: The life of Ray Bradbury, Morrow, New York.Weller S. (2005), The Bradbury chronicles: The life of Ray Bradbury, Morrow, New York.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.