manguuУправлениеUPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)2309-36332713-1645State University of Management10.26425/2309-3633-2021-9-2-57-75manguu-415Research ArticleУПРАВЛЕНИЕ ПРОЦЕССАМИPROCESS MANAGEMENTСвойства моделей управления городской агломерациейFeatures of metropolitan area governance modelshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-2522ПавловЮ. В.PavlovYu. V.

Павлов Юрий Владимирович, ст. преподаватель

443090, Советской Армии ул., 141, г. Самара

Yuriy V. Pavlov, Senior lecturer

141, Sovetskoi Armii ul., Samara 443090

Pavlov-mlad@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-9560ХмелеваГ. А.KhmelevaG. A.

Хмелева Галина Анатольевна, д-р экон. наук

443090, Советской Армии ул., 141, г. Самара

Galina A. Khmeleva, Dr. Sci. (Econ.)

141, Sovetskoi Armii ul., Samara 443090

galina.a.khmeleva@yandex.ruФГБОУ ВО «Самарский государственный экономический университет»РоссияSamara State University of EconomicsRussian Federation202101072021925775Copyright © Павлов Ю.В., Хмелева Г.А., 20212021Павлов Ю.В., Хмелева Г.А.Pavlov Y.V., Khmeleva G.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/415

Статья развивает методологическую базу для выбора оптимальной модели управления агломерацией поселений. Существующие агломерационные проблемы и потребность в ускорении роста вследствие агломерационного эффекта формируют вызов системе управления агломерацией. Для адекватного ответа важно понимать возможности моделей управления, которые можно выразить через описание свойств моделей. Для широко-масштабного описания свойств моделей нужно сформировать группы свойств, охарактеризовать каждое свойство, сравнить модели по степени его проявления, по возможности объяснить причину различий.

В статье исследованы работы в рамках теории муниципальных реформаторов, теории общественного выбора, в частности по вопросам централизации/децентрализации муниципалитетов, межмуниципального сотрудничества, эффективности экономики общественного сектора. Применялись общенаучные методы анализа, синтеза, группировки, сравнения.

Выявлено 29 свойств, представлено их пояснение и степень развития в зависимости от вида модели управления. Все свойства объединены в пять групп: экономическая, социальная, административная эффективность, демократизация, стабильность. Выявленные свойства позволяют оценить модель управления на предмет того, что получит агломерация от ее внедрения.

В результате исследования усилились возможности по обоснованию целесообразности внедрения той или иной модели. Научная новизна работы состоит в составлении более полного списка свойств моделей, в более подробном их изложении, подаче информации «от свойств», удобной группировке, позволяющей применять характеристику для оценки эффективности деятельности органов власти. Исследование может быть полезно гражданским служащим, курирующим агломерационные процессы.

The article develops a methodological basis for choosing the optimal model for managing the agglomeration of settlements. The existing agglomeration problems and the need to accelerate growth due to the agglomeration effect form a challenge to the agglomeration governance system. For an adequate response it is important to understand the capabilities of governance models. These capabilities can be expressed through the description of the features of the models.

For a large-scale description of the features of models, it is necessary to form groups of features, characterize each feature, compare the models according to the degree of its manifestation, and, if possible, explain the reason for the differences. The article investigates research papers within the framework of the theory of municipal reformers, the theory of public choice, in particular on the issues of centralization / decentralization of municipalities, intermunicipal cooperation, the efficiency of the economy of the public sector. The authors used general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, grouping, comparison.

The revealed features make it possible to assess the governance model in terms of what the agglomeration will receive from its implementation. All features are combined into five groups: economic, social, administrative efficiency, democratization, stability. The study revealed 29 features, presented their explanation and degree of development, depending on the type of governance model.

As a result of the study, the possibilities for justifying the feasibility of introducing models have increased. The authors represented scientific novelty by a more complete list of the features of models, a more detailed presentation of them, the approach of presenting information “from features”, a convenient grouping that allows you to use the characteristic to assess the effectiveness of the activities of government authorities. The study can be useful for civil servants in charge of agglomeration processes.

модель управлениясистема управлениясвойства модели управленияэффективность муниципального управленияагломерациядемократичностьместное самоуправлениеприграничные регионыgovernance modelgovernance systemfeatures of governance modelefficiency of municipal governancemetropolitan areademocracylocal governmentcross-border regionsReferencesВолчкова И.В., Минаев Н.Н. (2014). Теория и практика управления развитием агломераций: монография. Томск: Изд-во Том. гос. архит.-строит. ун-та. 234 с.Ahrend R., Gamper C. and Schumann A. (2014), “The OECD metropolitan governance survey: A quantitative description of governance structures in large urban agglomerations”, OECD Regional Development Working Papers. http://doi.org/10.1787/5jz43zldh08p-enГоряченко Е.Е. (2014). Межмуниципальное взаимодействие как способ улучшения социально-экономической ситуации в муниципальном образовании: предпосылки формирования, барьеры и основные модели управления агломерациями (материалы социологической лаборатории АСДГ) / Россия и страны СНГ: формирование и развитие городских агломераций. Сводный сборник к Всероссийской конференции «Развитие агломераций в России: практика и решения». Новосибирск. 202 с.Allers M., Natris J., Rienks H. and Greef T. (2021), “Is small beautiful? Transitional and structural effects of municipal amalgamation on voter turnout in local and national elections”, Electoral Studies, vol. 70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102284Гриценко Е.В. (2014). Городские агломерации: в поискахAndersson M. (2012), Metropolitan management – approaches and implications, Sixth Urban Research and Knowledge Symposium. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Resources/336387-1369969101352/Andersson.pdf (accessed 24.03.2021)оптимальной модели территориальной организации (сравнительно-правовой анализ) // Конституционное и муниципальное право. № 10. С. 28–36.Bird R. and Slack E. (2008), “Fiscal aspects of metropolitan governance”, In: Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J. R., Güell J. M. F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases, Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass., David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, USA, pp. 193–262.Ижгузина Н.Р. (2018). Формирование и развитие крупнейшей городской агломерации в экономическом пространстве региона: дис. … канд. экон. наук: 08.00.05. ФГБОУ ВО «Уральский государственный экономический университет». Екатеринбург.Blom-Hansen J., Houlberg K. and Serritzlew S. (2021), “Jurisdiction size and local government effectiveness: Assessing the effects of municipal amalgamations on performance”, European Journal of Political Research, no. 60, pp. 153–174. http://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12394Изотов Д.А. (2017). Экономический рост городов в неоднородном пространстве Китая // Экономика региона. Т. 13, № 3. С. 789–802. http://doi.org/10.17059/2017-3-12Caldas P., Ferreira D., Dollery B. and Marques R. (2019), “Are there scale economies in urban waste and wastewater municipal services? A non-radial input-oriented model applied to the Portuguese local government”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 219, pp. 531–539. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.076Маркварт Э., Соснин Д. (2018). Территориальные реформы местного самоуправления: оценка предпосылок и эффектов // Местное право. № 4. С. 19–34.Carruthers J. and Ulfarsson G. (2003), “Urban sprawl and the cost of public services”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, no. 30, pp. 503–522. http://doi.org/10.1068/b12847Нагимова А.М. (2009). Эффективность деятельности государственных органов управления как фактор повышения качества жизни в регионе: проблемы оценки и измерения: монография. Казань: Казан. гос. ун-т. 188 с.Cuadrado-Roura J.R. and Fernández Güell J.M. (2008a), “Metropolitan Areas and the Challenges of Competitiveness”, In: Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Güell J.M.F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases, Washington, DC, InterAmerican Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass., David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, USA, pp. 25–76.Павлов Ю.В. (2019a). Будущее муниципалитетов в агломерации: эволюция взглядов на метрополитенское управление // Экономическая политика. Т. 14, № 1. С. 126–153. http://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2019-1-126-153Cuadrado-Roura J.R. and Fernández Güell J.M. (2008b), The long road towards good metropolitan government, In: Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J. R., Güell J. M. F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases, Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass., David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, USA, рр. 263–278.Павлов Ю.В. (2019b). Классификация моделей управления городской агломерацией // Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета имени В.И. Вернадского. Экономика и управление. Т. 5 (71). № 1. С. 106‒122.Fox W.F. (2015), Structuring service delivery in small urban areas. The challenge of local government in developing countries, United Nations Human Settlements Program (UN-Habitat), UN Habitat, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 73–89.Пузанов А.С., Попов Р.А. (2009). Проблемы управления городскими агломерациями в современной России. Городской альманах: вып. 4 / науч. ред. Г.Ю. Ветров. М.: Фонд «Институт экономики города». 312 с.Goryachenko E.E. (2014), “Intermunicipal interaction as a way to improve the socio-economic situation in the municipality: prerequisites for the formation, barriers and basic models of agglomeration management (materials of the sociological laboratory of the ASDG)”, Russia and the CIS Countries: Formation and Development of Urban Agglomerations. Summary of the All-Russian Conference “Development of Agglomerations in Russia: Practice and Solutions”, Novosibirsk, Russia, 202 p. (In Russian).Рубл Б.А. (2013). Мировой опыт в эпоху городских агломераций: уроки для управления Москвой // Логос. № 4 (94). С. 267–287.Gritsenko E.V. (2014), “City agglomerations: in search of an optimal model of territorial organization (comparative-law analysis)”, Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, no. 10, pp. 28–36. (In Russian).Русановский В.А., Марков В.А., Бровкова А.В. (2018). Моделирование эффекта пространственной локализации в городских агломерациях России // Экономическая политика. Т. 13, № 6. С. 136–163. http://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-136-163Harjunen O., Saarimaa T. and Tukiainen J. (2021), “Political representation and effects of municipal mergers”, Political Science Research and Methods, no. 9 (1), pp. 72–88. http://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.17Силин Я.П., Анимица Е.Г., Новикова Н.В. (2017). Региональные аспекты новой индустриализации // Экономика региона. Т. 13, Вып. 3. С. 684–696. http://doi.org/10.17059/2017-3-4Izhguzina N.R. (2018), Formation and development of the largest urban agglomeration in the economic space of the region: Dissertation … candidate of economic sciences: 08.00.05, FGBOU VO “Ural State University of Economics”, Ekaterinburg, Russia. (In Russian).Стародубровская И., Славгородская М., Жаворонков С. (2004). Организация местного самоуправления в городах федерального значения. Науч. консульт.: Катаев Д.М.: ИЭПП. С. 151.Izotov D.A. (2017), “Urban economic growth in the Chinese heterogeneity space”, Economy of Region, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 789–802. http://doi.org/10.17059/2017-3-12 (In Russian).Хмелева Г.А., Тюкавкин Н.М., Свиридова С.В., Чертопятов Д.А. (2017). Кластерное развитие региона на основе инноваций в условиях санкций (на примере нефтехимического комплекса Самарской области) // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Т. 10. № 5. С. 83–98. http://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2017.5.53.6Khmeleva G.A., Tyukavkin N.M., Sviridova S.V. and Chertopyatov D.A. (2017), “Cluster development of the region on the basis of innovation under the sanctions (case study of the petrochemical complex in the Samara Oblast)”, Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 83–98. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2017.5.53.6Шугрина Е.С., Миронова Г.В. (2018). Общая характеристика российских агломераций: соотношение de juro и de facto // Местное право. № 1. С. 3–24.Klink J. (2008), “Recent perspectives on metropolitan organization, functions, and governance”, In: Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Güell J. M. F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases, Washington, DC, Inter-American Deve lopment Bank, Cambridge, Mass., David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, pp. 77–136.Ahrend R., Gamper C., Schumann A. (2014). The OECD metropolitan governance survey: A quantitative description of governance structures in large urban agglomerations // OECD Regional Development Working Papers. http://doi.org/10.1787/5jz43zldh08p-enLadd H.F. (1992), “Population growth, density and the costs of providing public services”, Urban Studies, no. 29 (2), pp. 273–295. http://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080321Allers M., Natris J., Rienks H., Greef T. (2021). Is small beautiful? Transitional and structural effects of municipal amalgamation on voter turnout in local and national elections // Electoral Studies. V. 70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102284Lee С. (2020), “Impacts of multi-scale urban form on PM2.5 concentrations using continuous surface estimates with highresolution in U.S. metropolitan areas”, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 204. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103935Andersson M. (2012). Metropolitan management – approaches and implications // Sixth Urban Research and Knowledge Symposium. Режим доступа: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Resources/336387-1369969101352/Andersson.pdf (accessed 24.03.2021).Lefèvre C. (2008), “Democratic Governability of Metropolitan Areas: International Experiences and Lessons for Latin American Cities”, In: Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Güell J.M.F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases, Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass., David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, USA, рр. 137–192.Bird R., Slack E. (2008). Fiscal aspects of metropolitan governance // Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Güell J.M.F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases. Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, Pp. 193–262.Lin W., Sun Y., Nijhuis S. and Wang Z. (2020), “Scenario-based flood risk assessment for urbanizing deltas using future land-use simulation (FLUS): Guangzhou metropolitan area as a case study”, Science of The Total Environment,vol. 739. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139899Blom-Hansen J., Houlberg K., Serritzlew S. (2021). Jurisdiction size and local government effectiveness: Assessing the effects of municipal amalgamations on performance // European Journal of Political Research. No. 60. Pp. 153–174. http://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12394Markvart E. and Sosnin D. (2018), “Territorial reforms of local self-government: an assessment of the prerequisites and effects”, Mestnoe pravo, no. 4, pp. 19–34. (In Russian).Caldas P., Ferreira D., Dollery B., Marques R. (2019). Are there scale economies in urban waste and wastewater municipal services? A non-radial input-oriented model applied to the Portuguese local government // Journal of Cleaner Production. V. 219. Pp. 531–539. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.076Matějová L., Plaček M., Krápek M., Půček M. and Ochrana F. (2014), “Economies of scale – empirical evidence from the Czech Republic”,Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 12, pp. 403–411. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00361-XCarruthers J., Ulfarsson G. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services // Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. No. 30. Pp. 503–522. http://doi.org/10.1068/b12847Medeiros E., Ferreira R. and Boijmans P. (Eds.) (2021), “Boosting cross-border regions through better cross-border transport services. The European case”, Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 291–301. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.01.006Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Fernández Güell J.M. (2008a). Metropolitan areas and the challenges of competitiveness // Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J. R., Güell J. M. F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases. Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University. Pp. 25–76.Mouratidis K. (2019), “Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being”, Cities, vol. 92, pp. 261–272. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.013Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Fernández Güell J.M. (2008b). The long road towards good metropolitan government // Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Güell J.M.F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases. Washington, DC, InterAmerican Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, Pp. 263–278.Nagimova A.M. (2009), The effectiveness of the activities of government bodies as a factor in improving the quality of life in the region: problems of assessment and measurement: monograph, Kazan State University, Kazan, Russia. (In Russian).Fox W.F. (2015). Structuring service delivery in small urban areas. The challenge of local government in developing countries // United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). Barcelona: UN Habitat. Pp. 73–89.Nelson A.C. and Foster K.A. (1999), “Metropolitan governance structure and income growth”, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 309–324. http://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2166.00019Harjunen O., Saarimaa T., Tukiainen J. (2021). Political representation and effects of municipal mergers // Political Science Research and Methods. No. 9 (1). Pp. 72–88. http://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.17Pavlov Yu.V. (2019a), “The Future of municipalities in metropolitan areas: Evolution of views on metropolitan governance”, Economic Policy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 126–153. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2019-1-126-153Klink J. (2008). Recent perspectives on metropolitan organization, functions, and governance // Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Güell J.M.F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases. Washington, DC, InterAmerican Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass., David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, Pp. 77–136.Pavlov Yu.V. (2019b), “Classification of metropolitan governance models”, Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Economics and Management, vol. 5 (71), no. 1, pp. 106‒122. (In Russian).Ladd H.F. (1992). Population growth, density and the costs of providing public services // Urban Studies. No. 29 (2). Pp. 273–295. http://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080321Pearson J. (2016), Metropolitan governance: A framework for capacity assessment. Guidance notes and toolbox, Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, pp. 68. Available at: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/giz2018-0191en-metropolitan-governance-framework-capacity-assessment.pdf (accessed 24.03.2021).Lee С. (2020). Impacts of multi-scale urban form on PM 2.5 concentrations using continuous surface estimates with highresolution in U.S. metropolitan areas // Landscape and Urban Planning. V. 204. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103935Puzanov A.S. and Popov R.A. (2009), Problemy upravleniya gorodskimi aglomeraciyami v sovremennoi Rossii, Gorodskoi al’manakh, issue 4, Sci. Ed. G.Yu. Vetrov, “The Institute for Urban Economics Foundation”, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Lefèvre C. (2008). Democratic governability of metropolitan areas: international experiences and lessons for Latin American cities // Rojas E., Cuadrado-Roura J.R., Güell J.M.F. (Eds.). Governing the Metropolis: Principles and Cases. Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank, Cambridge, Mass., David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, Pр. 137–192.Romero C. and Monzon A. (2018), “Evolution of the efficiency of metropolitan public transport areas during the financial crisis and recovery in Spain”, Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 33, pp. 115–122. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.083Lin W., Sun Y., Nijhuis S., Wang Z. (2020). Scenario-based flood risk assessment for urbanizing deltas using future land-use simulation (FLUS): Guangzhou metropolitan area as a case study // Science of The Total Environment. V. 739. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139899Ruble B.A. (2013), “Lessons from around the world for Moscow governance in a global metropolitan age”, Logos, no. 4 (94), pp. 267–287. (In Russian).Matějová L., Plaček M., Krápek M., Půček M., Ochrana F. (2014). Economies of scale – empirical evidence from the Czech Republic // Procedia Economics and Finance. V. 12. Pp. 403–411. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00361-XRusanovskiy V.A., Brovkova A.V. and Markov V.A. (2018), “Modeling the effects of spatial localization in urban agglomerations of Russia”, Economic Policy, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 136–163. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-136-163Medeiros E., Ferreira R., Boijmans P. (Eds.) (2021). Boosting cross-border regions through better cross-border transport services. The European case // Case Studies on Transport Policy. V. 9. No. 1. Pp. 291–301. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.01.006Shugrina E.S. and Mironova G.V. (2018), “General characteristics of the Russian agglomerations: the ratio of the dejuro and defacto”, Mestnoe pravo, no. 1, pp. 3–24 (In Russian).Mouratidis K. (2019). Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being // Cities. V. 92. Pp. 261–272. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.013Silin Ya. P., Animitsa E.G. and Novikova N.V. (2017), “Regional aspects of new industrialization”,Economy of Region, no. 13 (3), pp. 684–696 http://doi.org/10.17059/2017-3-4. (In Russian).Nelson A. C., Foster K. A. (1999). Metropolitan governance structure and income growth // Journal of Urban Affairs. V. 21. No. 3. Pp. 309–324. http://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2166.00019Slack E. and Côté A. (2014), “Comparative urban governance”, Future of cities: working paper Foresight, Government Office for Science. Available at: http://munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/uploads/296/14_810_urban_governance.pdf(accessed 24.04.2021).Pearson J. (2016). Metropolitan governance: A framework for capacity assessment. Guidance notes and toolbox. Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. Pp. 68. Режим доступа: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/giz2018-0191enmetropolitan-governance-framework-capacity-assessment.pdf (дата обращения: 24.03.2021).Starodubrovskaya I., Slavgorodskaya M. and Zhavoronkov S. (2004), Organization of local self-government in cities of federal level, Sci. Consult. D.M. Kataev, IEPP, Moscow, Russia, 151 p. (In Russian).Romero C., Monzon A. (2018). Evolution of the efficiency of metropolitan public transport areas during the financial crisis and recovery in Spain // Transportation Research Procedia. V. 33. Pp. 115–122. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.083Storto C. (2013), “Evaluating technical efficiency of Italian major municipalities: A data envelopment analysis model”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 81, pp. 346–350. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.440Slack E., Côté A. (2014). Comparative urban governance / Future of cities: working paper Foresight, Government Office for Science. Режим доступа: http://munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/uploads/296/14_810_urban_governance.pdf (дата обра-щения: 24.03.2021).Studzieniecki T., Palmowski T. and Korneevets V. (2016), “The system of cross-border tourism in the Polish-Russian borderland”, Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 39, pp. 545–552. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30298-2Storto C. (2013). Evaluating technical efficiency of Italian major municipalities: A data envelopment analysis model // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. V. 81. Pp. 346–350. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.440Tavares A.F. (2018), “Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review”, Miscellanea Geographica, no. 22 (1), pp. 5–15. http://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0005Studzieniecki T., Palmowski T., Korneevets V. (2016). The system of cross-border tourism in the Polish-Russian borderland // Procedia Economics and Finance. V. 39. Pp. 545–552.http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30298-2Tiebout C.M. (1956), “A pure theory of local expenditures”, Journal of Political Economy, no. 64, pp. 416–424. http://doi.org/10.1086/257839Tavares A.F. (2018). Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review // Miscellanea Geographica. No. 22 (1). Pp. 5–15. http://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0005Volchkova I.V. and Minaev N.N. (2014), Theory and practice of managing the development of agglomerations: monograph, Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building Publishing House, Tomsk, Russia. (In Russian).Tiebout C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures // Journal of Political Economy. No. 64. Pp. 416–424. http://doi.org/10.1086/257839Williams G. (1999), “Institutional capacity and metropolitan governance: the Greater Toronto Area”, Cities, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 171–180. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00014-1Williams G. (1999). Institutional capacity and metropolitan governance: the Greater Toronto Area // Cities. V. 16. No. 3. Pp. 171–180. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00014-1Worthington A. and Dollery B. (2000), “An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in local government”, Local Government Studies, no. 26 (2), pp. 23–52. http://doi.org/10.1080/03003930008433988Worthington A., Dollery B. (2000). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in local government // Local Government Studies. No. 26 (2). Pp. 23–52. http://doi.org/10.1080/03003930008433988Yaro R.D. and Ronderos L.N. (2011), International metropolitan governance: Typology, case studies and recommendations. Developed for the Colombia urbanization review, The World Bank Group, Regional Plan Association, 51 p.Yaro R.D., Ronderos L.N. (2011). International metropolitan governance: Typology, case studies and recommendations. Developed for the Colombia urbanization review // The World Bank Group, Regional Plan Association. 51 p.Yaro R.D., Ronderos L.N. (2011). International metropolitan governance: Typology, case studies and recommendations. Developed for the Colombia urbanization review // The World Bank Group, Regional Plan Association. 51 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.